I am going to start counting ..the upvote I gave you and this comment count as 2 .. see how many I have already done just on your post lol..sounds fun to try .. :)
Bear in mind I'm a very casual Steemit user and I don't concern myself with what actually happens under the hood when I click stuff... Could Calibrae allow users to 'refill' their tank from their own spendable funds if they go through their share of the reward pool too fast? I know users can always send transactions but that's a clumsy interface compared to a simple upvote.
What about using a tiny python script (using bottle) to make an easy to use browser based configuration tool? The user would just point their browser at the localhost:8000 or whatever, and it would take/validate their choices to make the config file(s), and maybe compile/run it.
@berniesanders again downvoted you with his bots. Just can't wait to see the new calibrae platform where I hope I will not bump in such people that are willing to destroy anything that's not in line with their interests.
Please if anything, do not allow accounts to smash other accounts out of spite. I understand the need for checks and balances like up voting and down voting, but they should have equally proportional power. If a post or comment gets 4 up votes and 1 down vote, the down vote should only have a 20% effect since it is 1 out of 5. Something like that.
The formula that effects rep based on mutes and follows sounds interesting. I look forward to seeing it in action!
so upvoting this post and commenting on it would have used up 2 of my transactions.. I am interesting in seeing if I can adapt to calibrae
I am going to start counting ..the upvote I gave you and this comment count as 2 .. see how many I have already done just on your post lol..sounds fun to try .. :)
Bear in mind I'm a very casual Steemit user and I don't concern myself with what actually happens under the hood when I click stuff... Could Calibrae allow users to 'refill' their tank from their own spendable funds if they go through their share of the reward pool too fast? I know users can always send transactions but that's a clumsy interface compared to a simple upvote.
What about using a tiny python script (using bottle) to make an easy to use browser based configuration tool? The user would just point their browser at the localhost:8000 or whatever, and it would take/validate their choices to make the config file(s), and maybe compile/run it.
@berniesanders again downvoted you with his bots. Just can't wait to see the new calibrae platform where I hope I will not bump in such people that are willing to destroy anything that's not in line with their interests.
Why 0 rep?
flagged by a whale.
Please if anything, do not allow accounts to smash other accounts out of spite. I understand the need for checks and balances like up voting and down voting, but they should have equally proportional power. If a post or comment gets 4 up votes and 1 down vote, the down vote should only have a 20% effect since it is 1 out of 5. Something like that.