Actually I've been posting less often now that I do have some automated votes.
In addition, I'm spending most of my time curating.
Thank you for the feedback though
Actually I've been posting less often now that I do have some automated votes.
In addition, I'm spending most of my time curating.
Thank you for the feedback though
I personally liked your post :)
Thanks, I didn't think it was that bad either.
In Bernie's defense, I think he does what he thinks is right for Steem and I don't mind that I am not everyone's cup of tea. I do write about Steem too often, so his feedback is valid even if the delivery could use some work. (Also, I am not very sensitive, so I don't care)
Also, my posts regularly attract in the top 10 comments on the site, and I think engagement is a sign of interest. While I consider his feedback, I am pretty okay with what I do.
Your quality of writing is good and you gave your own introspective on what is going on while at the same time giving yourself a peptalk. I can't fathom how that can be considered bad for steem in any way, shape or form.
This is a social platform built around the economy of attention. The size of your stake is irrelevant when it comes to debating anything. Kudos for taking it like a champ :)
like most criticism there are valid points in his feedback, I do need to be more diverse, I've written myself into sort of a rut, and have had trouble getting out of it.
As for questioning my intentions or whether or not I am good for Steem, that's just silly talk. :)
lol.
I can't help you in that regard but we all have bad spells or feel like we lack creativity when the opposite is generally true. I would assume you write about steemit quite often because you care about it, as do most of the hardcore userbase which remained past 2018. When you care about something that much tunnel vision becomes a stark reality. Take some time to look outside the metaphorical tunnel and you will see that big bright sky again my friend
Haters gonna hate.