Based on your comments above, you seem to have a problem with it. There's nothing else I could have possibly done that justifies your "old leaf" comment other than calling you out for continuing to whore for attention.
No, I was just reacting to you calling me an attention whore.
I don't know anything about burn porn. I don't care about porn one way or the other. I'll leave that the wankers to handle however they see fit. :)
You do know this is an attention economy right? The goal is to get attention and attract votes. :) (said in fun)
I still don't care whether or not we are friends. I don't require your approval, feel no need to fight with you. You just aren't that important to me. We can be friends or not. No biggy either way.
By the way, I was responding originally to boosta not you, when I said proving my point.
He is charging around making trolly comments for no reason or because he is sad people are fighting his Ponzi.
It actually appears as though your goal is to write as much junk as you possibly can, without it looking like complete trash, to receive all of those automated votes you get.
You really think THAT is good for Steem? Your repetitive junk about STEEMIT on Trending?
In Bernie's defense, I think he does what he thinks is right for Steem and I don't mind that I am not everyone's cup of tea. I do write about Steem too often, so his feedback is valid even if the delivery could use some work. (Also, I am not very sensitive, so I don't care)
Also, my posts regularly attract in the top 10 comments on the site, and I think engagement is a sign of interest. While I consider his feedback, I am pretty okay with what I do.
Your quality of writing is good and you gave your own introspective on what is going on while at the same time giving yourself a peptalk. I can't fathom how that can be considered bad for steem in any way, shape or form.
This is a social platform built around the economy of attention. The size of your stake is irrelevant when it comes to debating anything. Kudos for taking it like a champ :)
Based on your comments above, you seem to have a problem with it. There's nothing else I could have possibly done that justifies your "old leaf" comment other than calling you out for continuing to whore for attention.
No, I was just reacting to you calling me an attention whore.
I don't know anything about burn porn. I don't care about porn one way or the other. I'll leave that the wankers to handle however they see fit. :)
You do know this is an attention economy right? The goal is to get attention and attract votes. :) (said in fun)
I still don't care whether or not we are friends. I don't require your approval, feel no need to fight with you. You just aren't that important to me. We can be friends or not. No biggy either way.
By the way, I was responding originally to boosta not you, when I said proving my point.
He is charging around making trolly comments for no reason or because he is sad people are fighting his Ponzi.
It actually appears as though your goal is to write as much junk as you possibly can, without it looking like complete trash, to receive all of those automated votes you get.
You really think THAT is good for Steem? Your repetitive junk about STEEMIT on Trending?
Yep. That's really going to attract new users.
Maybe it's YOU who needs to change.
Actually I've been posting less often now that I do have some automated votes.
In addition, I'm spending most of my time curating.
Thank you for the feedback though
I personally liked your post :)
Thanks, I didn't think it was that bad either.
In Bernie's defense, I think he does what he thinks is right for Steem and I don't mind that I am not everyone's cup of tea. I do write about Steem too often, so his feedback is valid even if the delivery could use some work. (Also, I am not very sensitive, so I don't care)
Also, my posts regularly attract in the top 10 comments on the site, and I think engagement is a sign of interest. While I consider his feedback, I am pretty okay with what I do.
Your quality of writing is good and you gave your own introspective on what is going on while at the same time giving yourself a peptalk. I can't fathom how that can be considered bad for steem in any way, shape or form.
This is a social platform built around the economy of attention. The size of your stake is irrelevant when it comes to debating anything. Kudos for taking it like a champ :)
Haters gonna hate.