This already happening indirectly
Yes but without regard to how much curation that authors posts are going to SBI.
You can have a spammer making $0.02 STU with SBI getting maybe $0.001 optimistically vs a high producing author bringing much more to SBI (ideally via organic means).
One author is adding more back to SBI by means of the curation earned via there post so I am merely suggesting incentivizing that by factoring that in proportionally to the votes.
You do make some good points. We believe that this is something market forces will address, and prefer not to further complicate our algorithms in this way. They're already complicated enough that most members don't fully understand how everything works.
Anybody with the skills can do basic blockchain analysis to identify who brings the most curation reward into SBI and front-run our votes on the top accounts that they perceive as creating quality content. We know some members are already doing this to some extent, so accounts returning high curation are already earning more rewards, they just don't come directly from us.
Challenge accepted. Lol
I need to dig up your Google Sheets link again and see what I can cook up when I have time.
Posted using Partiko Android
I heard Google sheet link?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRhhnY8couo1lPKsOBLvwS1hfvVAlB6SrhAHWiM3qXOVep_AUenh97SyPAsMCBWH26HgCOrclNl31BZ/pubhtml
Now we're cooking with 🔥! Thanks, @takowi!
Posted using Partiko Android
You could also parse the blockchain to compare our actual upvotes with the curation we receive from each post.