No, not really. It's easy to miss dan when looking at where Steemit has gone since his departure, but it doesn't make dan any less shady, honestly.
I did that Netcoins vote thingy thing.
No, not really. It's easy to miss dan when looking at where Steemit has gone since his departure, but it doesn't make dan any less shady, honestly.
I did that Netcoins vote thingy thing.
yup agreed, i'm just messing around here..
Yah, I know.
but what was it though? if anything i can't remember all that much now, so I may not even know the story you have in mind. any link to share? maybe better to pm
What was the what now?
on what was perceived as shady. the algo? the exit? a combination?
Sorry for not replying. The lack of notifications makes it easy to miss and then forget about stuff.
I was just referring to dan in general.
His tendency to talk big about life, liberty, and prosperity, not to forget saving the world, with his projects - yet abandoning them immediately as his pockets have been filled.
I just find him shady. Super, super smart and talented. But shady.
Would Steemit be better with dan at the helm?
Mmmmaybe. Maybe not. He is better at economics than the people there at the moment.
But no, I don't know.
Haha what happened to yotifications on Steemit? I've been using Busy.org for the past few months so its okay here, no worries anyway. And yes, Steemit really needs to hire some proper econs guy..