I have done it, its easily done by maintaining a certain state of being (I cover it on one of my articles).
The interesting thing about this is... its debatable but at the same time the reasong why so many people try to debunk it is because they want to live in a world where everything is 100% objective, basically a world where the world itself is as it is and always has been while the people are a product of the world while in reality both the world and the beings in it are the same, they are consciences of the conscience, the world can change us... but we can also change the world (its correct also logically as we can observe with our modern societies).
There is one fact... you can produce results in an experiment with so many different means, you can debunk telekinesis but there will always be a small possibility that it is true and therefore it will always be debatable but no one side will win since they can both "prove" their points. The fact of the matter is... you can achieve everything with everything, you can use everything in so many different ways, its nautral that people that do telekinesis get debunked, especially when on stage its even harder to prove it with so many skeptics on the seats... because the practitioner might be on a level where they can just manage to do it but at the same time if the belief of the other individuals leans towards telekinesis being untrue, then the result of the experiment will fundamentally end up being a failure.
Therefore... we cannot disprove something while keeping this attitude of "disproving", in truth... whatever you believe the most will come true and so... this is why it is so debatable.

:)