Which books should never be made into movies, and why?

Gulliver’s Travels ended beign ‘adapted’ into this abomination:

Whatever satire on the human condition was present in the book was completely lost there: you found yourself wondering why they made it at all.

I Yes, I understand it's now been made into a motion picture, yet nobody truly recollects that it. Fahrenheit 451 is basically the narrative of a future that is as of now happening. It's not about restriction it's about how individuals surrendered books since they turned out to be increasingly anxious for stimulation and "data" that didn't require thought. They formed into a "too long; didn't read" culture hungry for moment satisfaction. On the off chance that a motion picture in light of this novel was done well, it would make individuals very awkward that they are viewing the film as opposed to perusing the book. Studios wouldn't have any desire to put out a motion picture that influences individuals to address in the case of watching it is correct or off-base. In the event that another film is made in light of Fahrenheit 451, they'll take no chances and treat it terribly or they'll just not make it by any means.

This great kids' book should be untouchable until the point when this trash originated from the profundities of damnation and demolished everything. One of the most exceedingly terrible if not the most noticeably bad children motion pictures at any point made.

This motion picture had appalling gathering at its season discharge with a 10% score on Rotten Tomatoes and a 3.8/10 score on IMDb - Movies, TV and Celebrities. This pitiful reason for a "film" was named for 9 Razzie honors and winning 2 (which is Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content!) and Worst Actor of the Decade for Mike Myers).