Sort:  

Specifically because we host then as a society yes, if we didnt provide any aid or support then I wouldnt be voicing my concerns but I am highly opposed to having even a penny of my tax dollars go towards people who do not want to contribute to society

Well it may be a leap that many of them, even, have a choice in the matter, yet thanks for the clarification.

If it's Flint Michigan were talking about or a real world situation where you have statistics and data from a established government agency then ill except those as homeless epidemics, but outside of areas like Flint Michigan I don't really see the point in serving the desperation of people who could go into the free market in front of them and establish some type of economic force for themselves.

I think everyone has a choice, and a series of choices lead those homeless people to their current situation. In Canada I'm talking btw, where I participate in the economy and pay taxes.

Its not my job to judge peoples life habbits, like the bad ones that make people go broke. Over eating, drugs and alcohol, gambling and subscriptions to electronic networks like microsoft and sony are all luxuries and indulgences that are going to bankrupt you if you dont budget.