US Department of Homeland Security Talks Blockchain R&D

in #blockchain8 years ago (edited)

The science and technology division of the US government  department created in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks is  increasingly taking an interest in blockchain technology. First revealed in a December call for research, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced this June that it had awarded a $199,000 grant to blockchain startup Factom that finds the startup researching how the emerging technology could be  used to ensure the security of cameras meant to monitor US borders. But while that project is specifically focused on Internet of Things  and data security, DHS data privacy program manager Anil John emphasized  that the agency has a larger, more exploratory interest in learning  more about both the strengths and potential weaknesses of blockchain  technology. John, whose division issued the call for applications under the DHS’s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, pointed to the growing interest in blockchain more broadly as a reason the DHS has been compelled to invest. John told CoinDesk: 

"For DHS use cases, the projects we’re funding are  focused on proving or disproving that security and privacy can be  supported by a blockchain-based infrastructure. It is much broader than  IoT and identity."

In addition to Factom, projects like Solarity Solutions, Respect  Network and Digital Bazaar have received funding to explore concepts  related to proving the DHS's hypotheses. As such, John's part of the  agency is not alone in supporting this exploration. Also looking into the technology is the department's Silicon Valley Office, which has developed an innovation program that seeks to engage startups on homeland security challenges. Managing director Melissa Ho said that her group, in contrast to the  data privacy program, is focused on improving authentication, a goal  that led to its partnership with Factom. "We thought it was a novel approach," Ho said. "Seeing that the  company had existing commercial customers, we thought this would be a  good opportunity." Other areas of investment unrelated to blockchain, Ho said, have  recently included projects focused on equipping canine units with  wearables and open-sourcing aspects of the DHS's travel restrictions  system. She used these examples as a way to showcase the broader  fact-finding the agency is conducting on ideas with the private sector. 

Device identity

While both Ho and John voiced an interest in the technology and its  capabilities, they each sought to stress that it remains early in the  DHS's exploration of the technology. As a result, they sought to indicate that the DHS is starting small  with blockchain by testing hypotheses based on what has been popularized  about its capabilities. In the case of Factom, John said that blockchain could play a role in  helping the DHS build an "identity" for machines and devices, which he  framed as a way to extend the agency’s monitoring services as more  devices become connected in the coming years. "The Factom piece is more along the line of these devices exist, but  how do we build a picture of the identity of this device over time? The  blockchain could be the catalyst that allow us to document the changes,"  he said. Other projects, he said, will be encouraged similarly, with the  agency building on its year-and-a-half fact-finding by engaging more  with outside stakeholders. "We discovered that in order to get to that point, there are some  fundamental pieces that need to be proven out. We identified what those  are and looked to put out a call for proposals," he said. 

Open technologies

Yet another question discussed was whether the DHS sees any  particular value in closed, permissioned blockchains or open, public  blockchains given that institutions seem increasingly apt to favor  experimentation with the former. Notably, John said that from the DHS’s perspective, it is  "irrelevant" which type of blockchain technology is used, and that each  is likely to be beneficial for certain purposes. In regards to public blockchains, John outlined a scenario whereby  the DHS could theoretically maintain an open-access system that stores  the credentials of first responders or doctors during emergencies. In this case, John said that DHS does not maintain that information,  but that it would be beneficial if it was available in a "decentralized  ledger at the state and local level". John said: 

"We are interested in both, but in order to get to that point, we need to know the security and privacy aspects are proven."

Next steps

Still, John said the agency’s activities are not limited to investing. For example, he mentioned that the DHS is involved in work being conducted by web standards body W3C, which is considering blockchain amid a wider bid to streamline online payments. John stressed that the DHS remains "cautious" about its interest in  the technology, emphasizing that he wants his agency to study the  technology in a "rational" manner that strives to determine  fundamentals, such as security. However, John said the DHS will seek to engage the wider blockchain community alongside such efforts, concluding: 

"We’re interested in hearing from the community and  getting insight into what the state of the art is and what the art of  the possible."

Image credit: Mark Van Scyoc / Shutterstock.com

Source