I'm agnostic as to whether there is or will be THE antichrist, but there is a consistency to the antichrist principle. Nero, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and many others like them have and do live out the antichrist archetype. But the opposite is also true. Osiris, Isaac, Joseph, Daniel, Socrates, and many others like them have and do live out the Christ archetype. Yet we do recognize that there is A CHRIST that in some way fulfills the form in a more complete way than those other people have. If we apply the principle found in the Book of Coming In and Going Out (aka, the Book of the Dead), That both the darkness and the light escalate together, then it would be logical to look for AN ANTICHRIST.

But beyond that, the few things this person has put out provoke even more questions. For example, he seems to suggest the existence of a pantheon of lesser gods that seek human sacrifice. But wherever these gods are found in the Old Testament, the chosen people are told to slaughter them. You say there's no anti-christ, yet there definitely seems to be a very real conflict between Jehovah and Baal, for instance. So how do you account for that?