@smooth I don't agree with mprep censoring you. But the bottom link was spammy to my mind if that's all their was.
It would have been better to have a more detailed explanation of why people should care. Some more info about the girl and maybe some musings about what you thought of her posting in general.
Hope this message is coming through clear. It's 3:30 AM and my coffee pot is broken.
Maybe it's too just too obvious to me that people might care about the first 1+ million follower celebrity, so I didn't explain it in the post.
I've been told by bitcointalk admins that they view the entire 'Alternative Cryptocurrencies' section as supporting a gambling game where people bet on coins by trading them. If a coin backing a social media site gaining high profile users with enormous reach is not relevant to such a game then I don't know what is.
My bitcointalk post was not about the girl, and if it were that would be off topic there. It was about the coin.
I left that place in 2013 and haven't looked back, I've felt much better since then.
But I think you're right. It was too obvious to you, and I guess that mprep didn't see the value in it. I wouldn't have censored you, but I would of popped in asking to explain, basically what you just explained here. Unfortunately, the obvious, rarely is.
You were the first one to say on bitcointalk that steemit was a scam and you know it is but some bucks are to be made before the global collapse.
Whether steemit is a scam or not is irrelevant. Bitcointalk admis have told me that they don't moderate scams. That is for the marketplace of ideas to sort out.
@najoh Very curious to know about this steemit scam stuff. I'd like to make up my own mind, but the opinions and research of others is always helpful.
Hello @smooth, I don't understand much about the issue in this conversation but I felt its importance. What is it anyway?