An article in 'The Economist' mentions 'proof of stake' but doesn't use 'delegated' ... (a verb).
I want to ask the community if 'Proof of Stake' is any different when it is not delegated?
I also want to ask the knowledgeable here if delegated proof of stake is set to overtake 'proof of work' as conjectured by this writer for the news magazine? Perhaps as a rider on that last question, as Dan Larimer is credited with having created the notion of 'delegated proof of stake', did the writer of the article describe the notion well enough?
I suppose this will have something to do with reviewing various EOS white papers ...
We are all a bit tired now ... maybe.
Read the whole article if you want here : https://goo.gl/9BxoAG / [if you aren't stopped by the 'paywall'] ... :-)
Congratulations @unawunwa! You have received a personal award!
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
@unawunwa, thank you for supporting @steemitboard as a witness.
Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
Once again, thanks for your support!
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Congratulations @unawunwa! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking