3325 BTC of support is meaningless though. Further it doesn't matter how much BTC people hold anyway - what matters is the hashrate supporting it.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
3325 BTC of support is meaningless though. Further it doesn't matter how much BTC people hold anyway - what matters is the hashrate supporting it.
A couple of points, to expand on the thoughts in this thread.
Short term profit isn't the only thing that drives the behavior of miners. Ideology, long term gain, political power, externalities, etc. all play a role. I want to emphasize that this meme, "hashpower is the only really important thing," is probably oversimplifying a very complex . If heuristics like that were true enough to act on, we could throw out the entire canon of behavioral econ.
Early trading on ViaBTC for the BitcoinCash fork puts it at over a billion dollar marketcap, and the fork hasn't even happened yet:
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@ancap47/bitcoin-hf-coin-already-has-started-trading-against-cny-on-viabtc-exchange
Great points. It is more complex but as you point out that poll is not really evidence. Also I think whether we like it or not most of the mining power is quite centralised and those who have a say have already voted with their hashing power.
It's a poll - they never include everyone. Its called a representative sample.
Can you point to a better one that also can't be sybil attacked?
It's irrelevant. The hash rate is all that matters.
yep, and there will be hashpower for big block fork.
I don't see it but who knows for sure. We will just have to wait.