TAXATION IS THEFT - SARS (South African extortion racket) Are trying to scare you. Libertarian says NO.

More clarity on tax treatment of bitcoin, but… Some questions remain unanswered.

First remember - You are NOT a slave - You are free. You do NOT have to comply with your Governments (mind control). They do Not own you and its time to understand that what governments say has ZERO relevance and is simply a threat, designed to control your thoughts and force your involuntary compliance. If you do not pay your government thieves, then its only a matter of time until they have no enforcers to scare you. Power to the people.

The South African Revenue Service’s (Sars)( Extortion racket) announcement that it considers cryptocurrencies to be intangible assets and not currencies has brought an end to widespread speculation about the nature of cryptocurrencies.

Who care what they think - Cryptocurrencies have NOTHING to do with governments. Blockchain tech is for all humans across the plane. lets free the plane, stop wars and take the power back. Do not pay the maffia.

Sars ( South Africas Extortion racket) confirmed that it would apply normal income tax rules to cryptocurrencies and that it expects taxpayers to declare gains and losses as part of their taxable income.

Asheer Jaywant Ram, CA(SA)( A brainwashed moron) and senior lecturer in the School of Accountancy( an istatution designed to steal your hard earned wealth) at the University of the Witwatersrand( brainwashing institution), says this means that transactions that involve cryptocurrencies like bitcoin will be regarded as barter transactions. In other words, individuals using bitcoin as a method of payment will need to consider the value of bitcoin in relation to the value of the goods received to determine income or gains. Ha Ha. BULLSHIT.

For individuals who buy and sell cryptocurrencies on an exchange, the announcement means that if they transact as speculators, income received will have to be included in their gross income and will be subject to normal tax, Joon Chong, tax partner at Webber Wentzel, says. - BULLSHIT

However, where someone holds cryptocurrencies for long-term gains, the sale would be subject to capital gains tax, she adds. - BULLSHIT

While the tax community has welcomed the clarification around arguably the most contentious issue about cryptocurrencies – its nature for tax purposes – there are still significant areas of uncertainty. FUCK THE TAX COMMUNITY.

The valuation of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin remains a point of major concern,( Of course it does because it gives the power back to the people) FUCK THE GOVERNMENTS) Ram says. In a barter transaction, the value of the bitcoin used to pay for goods and services would need to be determined to calculate the income or gain (or loss). Under normal circumstances, the value of goods received would be easily identifiable, but with cryptocurrencies establishing the value would be much harder as it trades on various international exchanges and price levels can differ substantially.

“Bitcoin has this high level of volatility in and of itself and across exchanges there is no parity,” Ram says. (Ram can go fuck himself.)

For example, bitcoin was trading at R84 500 around midday on April 9 on the South African exchange Luno ( LUNO is a goverment cy-op. STAY AWAY), but at R84 000 on Ice3X. It was trading at around R82 130 on Bitfinex in Hong Kong and at R82 194 on the euro exchange Bitstamp. (The spot rand-dollar and rand-euro exchange rates were used to calculate the rand values.) - And this has NOTHING to do with governments anywhere.

Ram says it remains uncertain which valuation Sars would find acceptable. Although it has confirmed that cryptocurrencies may give rise to gains, it didn’t clarify how it would value bitcoin for that purpose. (Ram can go fuck himself.)

“At this point [it is] one of the issues and I can see taxpayers wanting to argue either way, but then Sars would need to clarify what level of valuation or what exchange and market would need to be considered in order to value the bitcoin in a barter transaction scenario.” (Ram can go fuck himself.)

Another area of uncertainty relates to the VAT treatment of cryptocurrency transactions. TAXATION IS THEFT

Sars has confirmed that the VAT treatment of cryptocurrencies would be reviewed and that it would not require VAT registration as a vendor for purposes of the supply of cryptocurrencies in the interim. This means that taxpayers don’t have to register for VAT if their cryptocurrency supplies exceed the compulsory R1 million threshold for the total value of taxable supplies during a 12-month period.

Ram says since bitcoin is not considered a currency, there is a possibility that it could be regarded as a “good” for VAT purposes. If this is the case, exchanges who supply bitcoin may have to levy output tax on it, which would increase the cost of doing business in the bitcoin ecosystem.

Clarification in this regard is quite urgently needed, he adds.

Chong says it is also uncertain how the VAT legislation on cryptocurrencies and the updated definition of electronic services that was published in February will reconcile. The latter regulations – which defines electronic services quite broadly – seem to include trading of cryptocurrencies by a foreign supplier.

“A bit more clarity is still required in terms of VAT. Where does cryptocurrencies fit in, whether or not trading in cryptocurrencies should be an exempt supply, who is the recipient for supplies to an exchange, and whether cryptocurrencies [are] ‘services’ in the VAT Act?”

FUCK SARS - TAXATION IS THEFT