In what sense do they intend to make it several teams? This was supposed to be possible already, so is it just that they're breaking up the monopoly (by using a smaller mining "monopoly" of their own as part of the tactic) or do they have other tools to accomplish this?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm reaching the edge of what I know... But bitcoin's development is only really done by bitcoin core, in secret. BCH has at least 5 or 6 groups that are all working on the code.
I didn't watch the video, but this is a good place to start. Also look at BCH's letter they wrote to explain their vision.
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@scandinavianlife/who-is-really-behind-bitcoin-core-bilderberger-and-globalists-bch-is-the-true-anarcho-capitalist-bitcoin
Already seen it. I'll need to look into this more. If they can encourage more people being involved that might be a good thing, but BTC is a big organization as well and if the BCH organization has too little agreement then developement will become just as slow in BCH.
Here is the letter I was referring to https://falkvinge.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/letter-from-the-ceo.pdf
Interesting read. Some good, some less so. I'm at least pleased and intrigued by the state of mind that Falkvinge appears to be proposing.
Yeah, it will be interesting to see what happens... I'm starting to feel like BTC will probably win but ultimately be overtaken by other coins. BCH might be able to compete if it becomes the "real" bitcoin but I think that is a long shot at this point...