Isn't it the systems fault then? How is it @Haejin's fault that people are upvoting his content? I really don't understand it, you are basically saying that No one can be more famous than the other on Steem-It. Is that not what Communism is? Please show me your logic.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
First of all, the high value of haejin's posts are because of only 1 or 2 specific people upvoting his posts. The rest of the upvoters don't add up to a significantly large payout.
The system is designed such that each day there is a X number of STEEM available. Content creators receive their SBD and STEEM from this same fund for their posts and comments. Because haejin would post 6-8 times a day, and each of his post would have a potential payout of $200 or more, he had a relatively large stake of that X STEEM. A lot of people found that for the content of each post (not talking about his predictions or analysis itself), haejin need not get that big a portion of the avaliable X STEEM. Despite the accuracy of the prediction, you have to agree that all posts were kinda identical, a picture of his steemit profile, a small paragraph describing his prediction, a chart and then links to his youtube, crypto donations, and courses on TA.
Why downvote haejin's posts to zero? I don't know, they're doing all the downvoting, ask them.
He made me 3x my money. If that isn't enough to justify his posts making $200 I have no idea what would justify it. With more money I make then I will spend more on steemit. If it worked for him it can work for me. I think this comes down to staying positive and not worrying about others. If the system is based on survival of the richest then this website, overtime, will not make it.