It's really not anything to agree or disagree with. That is in fact Haejins mission here. That and what @solisrex said.

In good practice, Elliot Wave Theory does not care one bit about how well a company performs, what they do, or how much promise they have for the future. Haejin has many times mentioned the coins he is a big fan of, but it is no one's responsibility except the user to decide if they want to buy into whatever lip service or potential a company presents to the public. In good practice of the EW Principle, there is no such thing as a good coin or a bad coin, just price movement....and price movement is the ONLY thing analyzed in EW.

And in good trading practice, no one is encouraged to put money into any coin analyzed here without doing their own Due Diligence in that regard. The goal here is to educate, and to help others learn to gain wealth on their own through the implementation of the EW Principle in combination with a deeper recognition of chart patterns.

I believe much of the value comes from Haejin keeping his own opinion on each coin or service out of the picture. It's a professional performing a very high quality job for free, and not selling anything for anyone else along side it.

I am curious as to who gets to decide if a coin is a good coin anyway, except for the individual themselves.

It's not an easy thing to do, but best EW practice is to completely remove yourself from the analysis. Disconnect from emotions, news, rumors, and even time itself. Spreadcoin TA still says, accurately, that it is very bullish. When it will make it's move is a VERY difficult thing to pinpoint in some cases. But as long as the coin exists, and it shows the same bullish pattern, it's bullish...even if they have too many bugs in their programming, or it's use and support dwindle to near nothing. If the coin is OR isn't going to perform, that is NEVER determined by any characteristics of the coin, company, or expectations...it is only determined by analyzing the price movement.