There are plenty of assholes supporting all the different suposed implementations of Bitcoin. However there is one camp using censorship, manipulation and sidechains as a means to promote going against the white paper and Satoshis original plans for scaling.
Doing this is incredibly harmful and makes it something entirely different than Bitcoin as per Satoshis definition. The current ridiculous fees and "store of value" arguments with no basis aside, the accessibility of the main chain is being limited and the security of the network as a whole is being compromised one step at a time.
Don't really know enough about it to have an educated opinion. Wouldn't mind you breaking it down for me :p always so much to learn about in this space.
Interesting to know, although the arguments presented are still the same.
Ignore all the FUD. Just don't ignore the facts.
Fact is,
Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin per Satoshis definition and preplanned scaling.
Bitcoin Core team has censored, manipulated and stalled for years now. Trust will be harmed even if they shape up later.
The fees have reached insane levels and there is no knowing if ordinary transactions will ever be practical on the main chain again.
Still, also I want Bitcoin Legacy/Core to succeed and create something wonderful. It's the current as well as proposed product and the social behaviour of the main team and their fanbase which I oppose.
We just have to wait and see what comes out of it.
There are plenty of assholes supporting all the different suposed implementations of Bitcoin. However there is one camp using censorship, manipulation and sidechains as a means to promote going against the white paper and Satoshis original plans for scaling.
Doing this is incredibly harmful and makes it something entirely different than Bitcoin as per Satoshis definition. The current ridiculous fees and "store of value" arguments with no basis aside, the accessibility of the main chain is being limited and the security of the network as a whole is being compromised one step at a time.
i support side chains as way to bring more features to bitcoin but sidechains as a way to scale that dumb
Yes, no problem with sidechains really if the main chain is not made less accessible (either by fee, lessened security or else).
I love the idea of rsk.co do you?
Don't really know enough about it to have an educated opinion. Wouldn't mind you breaking it down for me :p always so much to learn about in this space.
I'm not on any side as I'm holding both! I just don't like the tactics that is all which both parties are guilty of IMO!
I understand the technology and I'm not going to fall victim to FUD thanks I will make my own objective decision
Interesting to know, although the arguments presented are still the same.
Ignore all the FUD. Just don't ignore the facts.
Fact is,
Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin per Satoshis definition and preplanned scaling.
Bitcoin Core team has censored, manipulated and stalled for years now. Trust will be harmed even if they shape up later.
The fees have reached insane levels and there is no knowing if ordinary transactions will ever be practical on the main chain again.
Still, also I want Bitcoin Legacy/Core to succeed and create something wonderful. It's the current as well as proposed product and the social behaviour of the main team and their fanbase which I oppose.
We just have to wait and see what comes out of it.
So what do you think about bitcoincash doing the EDA?
From what I gather, all issues were fixed and Core/Legacy devs will simply have to live with the competition of other chains.