My Reply to Jimmy Song's You Tube Video entitled "Bitcoin Cash is Fiat"

Just a few discrepancies with this Video -

1 - Jimmy Song, Promotes Bitcoin (BTC) and Roger Ver, Promotes Bitcoin Cash (BCH) - but yet, Jimmy who has not been studying economics for as many years as Roger - refers to Roger and the developers of Bitcoin Cash as people who are not as well educated in economics as the developers of Bitcoin (BTC) - That is strange since Roger has been studying economics since he was a teenager and has put his knowledge in to practice so well that he became a millionaire way before Bitcoin was a thing, and because of his knowledge of economics was wise enough to Jump on Bitcoin as soon as he found out about it and when it was only worth pennies or a few dollars and could have easily gone to zero, but he understood it enough that he was willing to invest 1000's of his own dollars and most likely is now closer to a Billionaire rather than a Millionaire. Is Jimmy a Millionaire, and if not - are you going to have more confidence in a the knowledge of economics from a Millionaire or a non-millionaire.

2 - Jimmy keeps saying that Bitcoin Cash is being lead by a small group of developers - and that they are the ones who forked Bitcoin into Bitcoin Cash - well someone please explain who was the small group of developers who took control over Bitcoin( BTC ) and decided that it would be better to design it as a Store of Value instead of Cash? - Even though the founder of Bitcoin (Satoshi Nakamoto) designed it to be used as Cash, hence the name of the White Paper "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System"

So let me get this straight - the founder calls his/her invention Bitcoin with the sole purpose of using it as electronic cash - but this small group of developers who have taken full control of the Crypto-Currency (Previously Known as Bitcoin) take it upon themselves to modify the system to be used as a Store of Value instead of a form of CASH - and then have the audacity to go around saying that their crypto-currency should be called Bitcoin even though it does not following the founders vision, but instead now follows their own personal vision and the heck with the founders vision, and on top of that decide that "we" are going to keep the Name - but lets forget about the CASH Part --- what a bunch of thieves and/or Fraudsters. If they wanted to diverge from the Founders Vision, they should have simply forked off and come up with their own name for their own vision of crypto-currency.

3 - The promoters of the Current Version of Bitcoin (BTC) are acting like politicians -- as demonstrated in the following quote:

"Artist use lies to tell the truth and politicians use them to cover the truth up" ― Alan Moore, V for Vendetta