Suggest reading this post by someone who offers some good objective warnings and valid points regarding Haejin. Surely, an “expert” with alleged 20+ years experience should have picked up on the obvious bulldozer that was heading towards us if he’s any good. After following for a long time you begin to see the number of completely revised counts he has to do.
Suggest scrolling through the last month and having a careful look at his wave counts and the number of ones which have been fundamentally invalidated by elliott theory since then. Of course, with the constant revisions it makes it seem like he always gets it right. And don’t forget the alternate counts!
Hell, I can predict price direction with 50% certainty, it’ll either go up or it’ll go down. Now let’s make my primary count going up and have an alternate for down. Wallah, my chances of being correct on either my primary or alternate are now 100%. Let’s now throw in a bull market prediction that price will reach higher highs sooner or later, whether it be days, months or years. And BOOM, different pathway same destination. Wow! What do you know. Im never wrong :o !
Dude really, stfu. See what happens when you spoon feed these babies. Son he gave you the books, he spoke on awareness, even a a fucking legal disclaimer up. So because you didnt do your due diligence you mad? We are in the beginning of cryptos. A correction happened and because Lee wasnt 100% correct you mad? Clown, get a pack of wet wipes and pat yourself down. Why werent you out advising people on this major correction? Its nice to come out now.
Dude, are you blind? Or are you unable to call an orange an orange and would prefer to call it a banana. Can we call a wrong a wrong and not a right and then not attack those who dare to call it a wrong? That’s the only attitude that’s babyish here.
Also, i love how every time the argument is always yeah, why didnt u do TA or why didnt you predict this then. Do you see me promoting myself as a 20+ year veteran who has amazing accuracy and screaming out hey! Trust me! Have i ever made the claim that im a guru and made money off of this claim? Also, id like if you wouldnt resort to personal attacks. It just shows how likely you are to be a blind follower and fundamentalist who isnt willing to listen to anything outside of his comfy world perception.
Id suggest not trying to come at me with empty insults without any points of dicussion or substantive arguments because i will bury you with superior logic. And anyone with half a brain should be able to see the validity of my points as opposed to vacuous personal insults like “clown”. This isnt a playground. Can we actually talk about the points of discussion and facts? Or would you prefer we just name call each other and let who’s the best name caller decide who has the better point?
@rudcharts looking at ur previous comments is hilarious man. It seems like your just a bandwagonner. So many Master Lee Master Lee and then also sucking up to berniesanders but then later you start posting about how Haejin was completely off about verge. You’re like a fish flickering around. Stick to your guns mate. If i had to guess your age id say 12 by the way you act
Kev, if you think he's a fraud why don't you just leave and do your own TA? You seem to rather spend hours digging through Haejin's blog looking for inconsistency. Don't you have a life? If you're so confident he's a fraud why are you looking for justification?
Those are your words not mine. I never outright called him a fraud but let’s play devil’s advocate and imagine that I do assert that.
Wouldn’t doing the exact opposite of what you suggest be the righteous course of action if i believed he was a fraud? If I believe it’s a fraud wouldn’t the right thing to be to try to warn others? And present the evidence for my beliefs so as to prevent others from being put through the burner? Or should i be like one of those bitconnect fanboys and close my eyes and say fuck everyone else hehehe
Im not outright claiming he’s a fraud. I’m simply pointing out objective historical facts and points which I have observed and which you too can look at. And then presenting a viewpoint on these observations.
I dare you to challenge me on that point, I dare you. Or are you morally corrupt and believe people shouldnt try to present possible dangers and forewarn others?
Fairy land is a happy place where no one dies.
You're not warning anyone of anything, you're making fallacious statements; the reason I started following this blog is because of the consistency of his historical posts. I've found many, many counts of his that have been accurate up to 100$.. like scarily accurate; he's already made me a lot of money.
Wait, are we looking at the same blog because im pretty sure im drawing attention to his wrong calls WHICH are facts clearly documented on his blog. What is fallacious? It’s literal fact. Please look at crossed wave 1 and 4s in QTUM, XVG, and miscounted 3 and 5s in XRP. All i am calling out it LITERALLY facts.
@erit2018 It’s very selfish to be happy and all sweet when he’s made you a lot of money. So you don’t really need to care about the people who’ve been hurt. As long as youre good who cares about others right? That’s an awfully selfish tact to take. Dont really have a response to that do you? You’ve sort of just shown your true nature there matey.
Yeah Kev, i've made money because I've been doing this for a decade and I've learned to remove emotion from investing. I'm sorry if you've gotten caught up in FOMO/Greed selling but it's a learning lesson in the long run. Keep your chin up bud.
Think about this market as taking 5 steps forward and 3 steps back, You're still (net) "2 steps" forward.
The utility of TA is to attempt to take less steps back, 5 steps forward 2 steps back (Net 3 steps)
Having awareness of price pathways can help you take less steps back.
@erit2018 im glad you’ve started talking in a more civilised manner. But as I recall you literally attributed your profits to following Haejin. Now you’re backflipping and attributing that it’s because you’ve been in for 10 years. I dont know what to say anymore when we’ve got people like you backflipping and contradicting their own statements. Is it no wonder we have our doubts about you people?
Perhaps an admission of guilt that there was a spark of truth to what i said. As I said, for the winner it’s always fine. Just like bitconnect scam. You wont hear the people who won money and got out before being burned complain. But that’s literally the definition of selfishness. Throw others into the fire because im already safe.
incoherence the edor sprouts by the Indians
Yup ☝🏻. That’s very well summed up.
@kevitos. If you understand just a basic Elliott wave principles, it's always evolving. When it's invalidated, you change your projection. You said, Hell you can predict price direction with 50% certainty and your primary or alternate count are now 100%. Wrong. if you predict your primary count and turn out the alternative count is right, you loose 50%. Next time you predict your alternative count, and it turns out your primary count is correct, you loose another 50% again. So your total lose is 100%. That's worse than a blind man hitting a target. I sincerely hope you go learn more about trading or don't trade at all. Just hold your BTC and sell on Jan, 1, 2020. You will most likely make money.
@ropaar Exactly, you seem to be suggesting that TA really isnt that predictive if you can basically be completely wrong. It seems like it’s just a way to justify your wrongs and paint them as not really being “wrong”. But a loss is a loss. It’s fanciful to paint it as a theoretical win. If TA isnt better at predicting than simple holding then i believe that means it’s worse than placebo. See I too as Haejin claims come from a scientific background.
Let me spit some knowledge. Many many drugs and treatments look like they have a positive effect. In fact, they do have a positive effect. But when you test that effect against doing nothing, you often come up with results that show doing nothing yields even more positive effects. So although a drug has an absolute positive effect, it is net negative when compared with doing absolutely no treatment.
@kevitos - I respect your view on the topics discussed here. However, I would like you to do me a favor. It's January 18th where I am. By the end of February, hit me up. At that point, I will completely validate your views here by posting it on my blog for all Haejin followers to see......or.......at that point you won't hit me up after all because you'll see that this Analysis is centered around identifying the trends of the higher order. I mean that seriously, keep it in mind, and I will be glad to post that if the higher degree of trend doesn't bring most of the calls to their projections in the mid term. Nobody is correct all the time, and I don't know anyone who claims to be, but I have't found anyone more accurate than Haejin. If you have, please share that person with me, as I would love to make more money.