I'd urge anyone reading this to drop over to @dutch's original post too and have a read - he consistently puts together posts that are interesting, useful and full of analysis.
It's a terrible shame to repost his content without any further discussion and then reap the rewards for doing so. The resteem button is designed for the express purpose of re-sharing content to a wider audience and demonstrating you support the author. I feel it does original authors a real disservice and brings down the quality of this platform when content is recycled with the headline only, particularly when time has been put into making the original post.
Just food for thought.
you're not paying attention.
let me break it down for you in small bytes..
I posted the link to dutches original post.
NOT Return to Being Currency
if you notice that's in blue...blue is a link. this link goes to Dutch's post.
I also wrote.
Repost from
@dutch
in which he says
which includes attribution and another link
anything more that I can help you with?
That comes across as a little patronising, but thank you. It hadn't escaped my attention that you provided a link to the original author's article.
I feel we have a fundamental difference of opinion here, so I shan't labour the point. It is, however, my opinion that Steemit is at its best when used as a platform for discussion, like any form of social media. Copying somebody else's words into a new post and providing a link is great, but it'd be really nice to see a little discussion on your part - what's your opinion on this original post? I'd genuinely love to know and feel it'd really contribute something.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
A LITTLE patronizing?
but I tried SO HARD