Using your theory, that would imply that people that post about Bitcoin have no vested (emotional) interest; making information, rather than pump-aganda that suits a vested agenda. In reality, I think most people posting about Bitcoin actually have a vested interest. why would anyone share anything about something that has absolutely no affect on them - other than the obvious desire to control what everyone else is doing?
If you had a ton of Bitcoin, you'd want to inform people of the benefits of owning it. If you own none and post information that positively reflects BTC, why? You likely won't ever do that without some interest in BTC. However, people that talk about only the negative side of coin - do not own it (obviously).
I think it's fair to say most of the people pumping out the bad news and doom are either one or more of the following:
- Pissed at themselves because they do not own BTC
- They wish to alter/control the behavior of other people (for whatever reason)
- They directly financially benefit from decreased value of BTC (short position, accumulating more, manipulating markets)
I can't think of any other reason a human would have to talk about something they claim to express no interest in. people do shit they don't want to do everyday - it's called working! and they wouldn't do it if it stopped paying..LOL
Ok, it may be stupid to say what I said.))
They may have steem and they make content about grow and loss of bitcoin to upvote yourself.
Not a stupid thing to say if it makes people think 😎👍
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. Thanks
That's a great way to look at life, @doelist! adding that one to my mental register 😉
The whole "who is Satoshi Nakamoto" mystery has been completely ignored lately.
And what the millions of coins "he" still holds? Where are they? When/will they ever hit the market?
Could bitcoin be part of some globalist agenda?