It still does not deserve 6% of the reward to just 1 person... Number of upvotes doesnt mean anything, most of users just jump to upvote high reward posts for the curation reward, not for the content itself... I agree that no one should decide who deserve what, but thats exactly just what happening here, a few whales are deciding 1 user deserve more reward than other... Abusive downvote is just as wrong as abusive upvote, its the same... Imagine the situation where someone buy enough SP to upvote himself until getting 50% or 80% of the reward pool, that could happen, just someone with enough money have to notice this opportunity and it will happen... This is a flaw and the system and need to be somehow fixed... There many way to abuse the reward pool and in the future need to be fixed somehow...
I am far from been a communist my friend, actually the complete opposite...