Wish i had time to write on this, i made one post long time ago about the research i did but every study of an indicator comes with so many parameters you can play with, quite some explanation needed. Some signals had a +80% accuracy, head- and shoulders was one of them (the top formation, not the bottom one), triple point- and figure breakouts were doing very good (old stuff, compare with support lines that get tested a few times). That's it bro except for the fact that moving averages were the worst :-)