Again, you refuse to actually make a distinction between the two and opt instead to make the failing ad hominem argument.
The point of this back and forth is only to serve as education to others who might be reading it. By name calling, the vast majority are automatically going to perceive that you are losing the argument. So thanks.
Again, you refuse to actually make a distinction between the two and opt instead to make the failing ad hominem argument.
The point of this back and forth is only to serve as education to others who might be reading it. By name calling, the vast majority are automatically going to perceive that you are losing the argument. So thanks.
losing the argument? You haven't see this video