TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the last week (2017.12.18-2017.12.24)

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators of the last week.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

According to the ideology of the Steemit creators, the discussion is as valuable an element as the author's content. Confirmation of this is the allocation of a separate pool of awards for comments.

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published rewarded comments for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

20486 authors published their rewarded comments during this day.

24370 accounts participated in the comments curating according to information from the database.

364805 votes were made during this day.

81076,25 SBD - is the total author rewards for this day.

TOP-200 effective comments curators for the last week (2017.12.18-2017.12.24)

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@greenman	716	269	36	1654,92	2,04	21,73
2	@pharesim	1080	579	0	680,89	0,84	19,24
3	@surpassinggoogle	638	366	1	912,64	1,13	16,31
4	@swissclive	384	292	9	633,68	0,78	9,03
5	@esteemapp	3430	605	1	251,77	0,31	7,44
6	@gentlebot	305	275	100	443,6	0,55	5,95
7	@good-karma	567	362	1	323,06	0,4	5,71
8	@thing-2	303	265	100	437,5	0,54	5,66
9	@transisto	86	43	52	2398,21	2,96	5,03
10	@trafalgar	503	75	2	1146,7	1,41	4,2
11	@tamim	74	33	57	2349,33	2,9	3,78
12	@cryptoctopus	189	117	4	556,34	0,69	3,18
13	@marketreport	1451	267	100	205,8	0,25	2,68
14	@czechglobalhosts	305	129	3	397,38	0,49	2,5
15	@libertyteeth	400	180	16	280,69	0,35	2,47
16	@derrick829	481	121	11	396,84	0,49	2,34
17	@canadian-coconut	180	95	3	455,21	0,56	2,11
18	@jaki01	307	161	6	243,04	0,3	1,91
19	@broncnutz	378	156	4	245,59	0,3	1,87
20	@khaleelkazi	196	67	24	555,71	0,69	1,82
21	@midnas-howler	219	139	8	233,28	0,29	1,58
22	@redbanana	388	113	26	265,06	0,33	1,46
23	@tommyhansen	186	69	31	396,97	0,49	1,34
24	@michaellamden68	1503	57	33	460,94	0,57	1,28
25	@taskmaster4450	475	234	5	108,6	0,13	1,24
26	@lyndsaybowes	540	176	2	134,55	0,17	1,16
27	@exyle	272	141	3	166,78	0,21	1,15
28	@matt-a	215	60	8	360,69	0,44	1,06
29	@acidyo	148	103	2	181,72	0,22	0,91
30	@abh12345	374	223	5	73,71	0,09	0,8
31	@kevinwong	171	125	2	131,45	0,16	0,8
32	@theaustrianguy	293	184	7	81,07	0,1	0,73
33	@megaspore	159	58	100	251,22	0,31	0,71
34	@nkkb	427	55	72	255,37	0,31	0,69
35	@alexbeyman	299	85	22	164,87	0,2	0,68
36	@kaylinart	121	67	26	208,84	0,26	0,68
37	@zer0hedge	340	105	6	131,4	0,16	0,67
38	@newsflash	42	4	96	3289,7	4,06	0,64
39	@ulfr	479	124	7	102,08	0,13	0,62
40	@socky	157	50	50	243,17	0,3	0,59
41	@dennisschroeder	204	102	100	118,8	0,15	0,59
42	@onceuponatime	164	85	3	137,13	0,17	0,57
43	@blocktrades	41	35	7	331,6	0,41	0,57
44	@demotruk	158	69	43	166,68	0,21	0,56
45	@xpilar	577	130	2	87,13	0,11	0,55
46	@hebrew	135	71	11	154,39	0,19	0,54
47	@gamer00	207	102	9	104,13	0,13	0,52
48	@rynow	677	159	4	65,44	0,08	0,51
49	@humanearl	114	42	100	248,26	0,31	0,51
50	@bestbroplayer	462	284	100	35,77	0,04	0,5
51	@kryptonia	143	55	100	183,19	0,23	0,49
52	@hilarski	393	206	20	47,26	0,06	0,48
53	@runicar	123	73	27	123,59	0,15	0,44
54	@d-pend	155	88	4	100,72	0,12	0,43
55	@double-u	206	51	34	163,45	0,2	0,41
56	@tytran	135	75	45	113,35	0,14	0,41
57	@javybar	226	81	25	101,47	0,13	0,4
58	@awgbibb	237	165	4	48,11	0,06	0,39
59	@ghasemkiani	1461	153	1	52,29	0,06	0,39
60	@tt-dogg	162	53	49	148,08	0,18	0,38
61	@extrospect	32	11	84	670,4	0,83	0,36
62	@amiramnoam	154	87	5	84,59	0,1	0,36
63	@knircky	39	31	58	238,56	0,29	0,36
64	@kus-knee	201	121	3	59,16	0,07	0,35
65	@barbro	63	20	97	356,19	0,44	0,35
66	@dragosroua	342	141	9	48,81	0,06	0,34
67	@michelle.gent	147	58	9	119,7	0,15	0,34
68	@gmuxx	179	105	21	63,94	0,08	0,33
69	@mjrcrypto	596	25	10	259,04	0,32	0,32
70	@calaber24p	108	33	63	201,11	0,25	0,32
71	@grumpycat	39	5	23	1311,64	1,62	0,32
72	@mammasitta	273	139	8	45,28	0,06	0,31
73	@solisrex	35	16	69	397,68	0,49	0,31
74	@etcmike	253	58	13	108	0,13	0,31
75	@lordoftruth	207	151	2	42,21	0,05	0,31
76	@mafsteem	85	36	98	175,61	0,22	0,31
77	@djohan	374	66	68	92,89	0,11	0,3
78	@majes.tytyty	210	67	13	92,67	0,11	0,3
79	@paulag	62	31	45	195,1	0,24	0,3
80	@tarazkp	205	112	3	53,64	0,07	0,29
81	@thedamus	162	79	45	76,24	0,09	0,29
82	@mikepm74	117	73	15	77,36	0,1	0,28
83	@stackin	355	223	2	25,6	0,03	0,28
84	@damarth	43	3	96	1861,54	2,3	0,27
85	@sharonomics	139	52	56	107,01	0,13	0,27
86	@timcliff	133	114	5	48,36	0,06	0,27
87	@lexiconical	181	111	4	48,68	0,06	0,26
88	@mexbit	82	30	69	180,63	0,22	0,26
89	@steevc	278	171	4	29,36	0,04	0,25
90	@bullionstackers	65	35	48	145,35	0,18	0,25
91	@soundlegion	131	55	61	91,6	0,11	0,25
92	@cryptographic	53	21	71	247,99	0,31	0,25
93	@raybrockman	166	58	9	83,13	0,1	0,24
94	@pagandance	131	68	85	72,04	0,09	0,24
95	@cryptokraze	121	25	54	189,43	0,23	0,23
96	@leemikyung	137	77	3	61,03	0,08	0,23
97	@davidorcamuriel	98	31	19	151,21	0,19	0,23
98	@danizaharie	101	76	31	60,38	0,07	0,22
99	@janusface	118	58	17	77,34	0,1	0,22
100	@tradewonk	104	54	15	79,78	0,1	0,21
101	@flurgx	111	93	72	45,65	0,06	0,21
102	@everittdmickey	540	133	2	32,35	0,04	0,21
103	@wwf	179	70	19	60,57	0,07	0,21
104	@gardenofeden	209	100	3	40,07	0,05	0,2
105	@babsboard	63	22	100	183,07	0,23	0,2
106	@opheliafu	56	44	76	94,36	0,12	0,2
107	@sochul	64	10	68	415,63	0,51	0,2
108	@purepinay	140	100	4	39,71	0,05	0,19
109	@dobartim	369	138	2	27,64	0,03	0,19
110	@coolbowser	92	23	66	171,98	0,21	0,19
111	@rewardpoolrape	52	3	99	1328,36	1,64	0,19
112	@apolymask	182	87	100	43,7	0,05	0,19
113	@sebastianjago	95	34	47	108,81	0,13	0,18
114	@adm	1351	3	1	1213,58	1,5	0,18
115	@nikez452	66	31	16	110,29	0,14	0,17
116	@daumantas	65	19	77	182,28	0,22	0,17
117	@michaelmorcos	103	39	58	88,08	0,11	0,17
118	@schamangerbert	258	126	8	27,73	0,03	0,17
119	@cryptopie	229	83	21	42,42	0,05	0,17
120	@darsico	217	55	20	62,61	0,08	0,17
121	@ashe-oro	86	32	40	103,79	0,13	0,16
122	@paul-gillbanks	94	43	43	76,81	0,09	0,16
123	@jamesbrown	44	14	69	241,23	0,3	0,16
124	@francisk	162	78	20	42,52	0,05	0,16
125	@davidpakman	216	63	63	51,76	0,06	0,16
126	@ausbitbank	53	43	2	76,63	0,09	0,16
127	@eric-boucher	248	91	7	36,55	0,05	0,16
128	@afrog	96	44	100	70,17	0,09	0,15
129	@talanhorne	96	55	51	54,64	0,07	0,15
130	@roxane	122	90	2	33,39	0,04	0,15
131	@underground	233	88	31	33,83	0,04	0,15
132	@mattclarke	183	95	39	32,25	0,04	0,15
133	@velimir	226	151	5	20,66	0,03	0,15
134	@teamhumble	146	87	12	35,92	0,04	0,15
135	@machhour	204	44	65	71,96	0,09	0,15
136	@reddust	145	71	15	44,46	0,05	0,15
137	@brothermic	64	29	52	106,27	0,13	0,15
138	@camilla	76	43	18	64,88	0,08	0,14
139	@biasnarrative	93	39	35	72,14	0,09	0,14
140	@echowhale	228	7	96	421,24	0,52	0,14
141	@meesterboom	291	137	1	21,33	0,03	0,14
142	@tipu	508	64	8	43,63	0,05	0,14
143	@twinner	73	42	10	69,5	0,09	0,14
144	@senseicat	153	32	35	92,56	0,11	0,14
145	@ew-and-patterns	53	16	26	177,51	0,22	0,14
146	@fyrstikken	58	30	30	95,6	0,12	0,14
147	@dividendgrowth	39	12	75	236,91	0,29	0,14
148	@dana-edwards	30	20	100	132,31	0,16	0,13
149	@deanliu	49	33	27	81,33	0,1	0,13
150	@howtostartablog	215	89	9	27,74	0,03	0,12
151	@skreza	112	39	39	62,72	0,08	0,12
152	@rivalhw	133	69	3	35,16	0,04	0,12
153	@englishtchrivy	144	39	22	62,57	0,08	0,12
154	@sobiakanwal	73	28	52	85,7	0,11	0,12
155	@rebeccaryan	131	73	9	34,13	0,04	0,12
156	@pouchon	105	31	47	81,51	0,1	0,12
157	@v4vapid	64	41	1	59,51	0,07	0,12
158	@achim86	192	57	31	41,37	0,05	0,12
159	@whatsup	271	140	4	17,27	0,02	0,12
160	@ackza	136	82	48	30,47	0,04	0,12
161	@lichtblick	210	93	1	26,48	0,03	0,12
162	@mrviquez	109	80	34	28,77	0,04	0,11
163	@surfyogi	44	40	100	58,31	0,07	0,11
164	@oflyhigh	53	29	10	80,78	0,1	0,11
165	@sandrino	57	3	100	781,79	0,96	0,11
166	@adamantine	125	61	53	36,55	0,05	0,11
167	@donkeypong	49	48	1	47,38	0,06	0,11
168	@xyz666	247	43	100	54,11	0,07	0,11
169	@papa-pepper	67	63	39	35,11	0,04	0,11
170	@hendrix22	137	66	8	34,69	0,04	0,11
171	@asmolokalo	163	49	7	47,76	0,06	0,11
172	@lightsplasher	138	56	10	39,93	0,05	0,11
173	@bayuya	43	6	67	344,62	0,43	0,1
174	@hossary	69	21	72	94,92	0,12	0,1
175	@jaynie	142	93	17	21,51	0,03	0,1
176	@overkillcoin	206	78	7	26,46	0,03	0,1
177	@centering	45	30	25	65,14	0,08	0,1
178	@davedickeyyall	178	82	16	26,07	0,03	0,1
179	@brian.rrr	53	27	19	78,81	0,1	0,1
180	@streetstyle	64	41	11	51,41	0,06	0,1
181	@greenrun	220	135	5	15,56	0,02	0,1
182	@libertyepodcast	82	25	45	77,95	0,1	0,1
183	@tarquinmaine	102	44	82	44,44	0,05	0,1
184	@elizahfhaye	168	52	64	37,43	0,05	0,1
185	@ozchartart	146	39	5	45,01	0,06	0,09
186	@fatkat	129	26	89	73,51	0,09	0,09
187	@lasper	76	15	72	125,66	0,15	0,09
188	@richard-921	88	26	71	69,94	0,09	0,09
189	@valorforfreedom	87	36	30	53,75	0,07	0,09
190	@cjsdns	194	86	1	20,44	0,03	0,09
191	@bleujay	55	28	16	67,2	0,08	0,09
192	@khackett	100	35	17	52,64	0,06	0,09
193	@dj123	179	42	24	42,9	0,05	0,09
194	@michaelstobiersk	69	60	58	29,03	0,04	0,09
195	@stephenkendal	50	38	14	43,72	0,05	0,08
196	@cron	51	14	19	122,64	0,15	0,08
197	@cornholio	41	35	100	48,94	0,06	0,08
198	@aggroed	149	127	89	13,31	0,02	0,08
199	@fur2002ks	115	63	9	25,04	0,03	0,08
200	@kobold-djawa	108	57	32	28,37	0,03	0,08

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the last week (2017.12.18-2017.12.24)

What does this mean?

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

How it works?

TOP-200 effective comments curators for the last week (2017.12.18-2017.12.24)

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

Information sources

@mammasitta,

Congratulations.

@mammasitta Thanks....

Its my pleasure that you remember me, I love to visit your every post, i try to learn something from you all the time.always thankful to you for your support and guidance.

Stay Blessed for ever.