Anyway, I know you're set on your opinion and feel superior to anyone here. So go ahead, drink your ClO2. I'm not going to stop you, I just refuse to let misinformation like that uncommented under my post.
yes. I drink my clO2 which passed enough studies and tests and you inject some weird nanotechnologic rna vaccine which doesnt even pass the normal tests, cuz WE HAVE NO TIME
go ahead
*for your information: out of clO2 comes only water, salt
but yeah, you also seem to feel superior even though you didnt read a single study cuz you couldnt find one LEL
Those studies that you refer to are likely actually indicators for testing the toxicity levels and safety levels on ClO2 as an industrial cleaner. i.e. at what levels does it cause eye irritations, throat and lung irritation and skin irritation.
People, please do not drink ClO2 it is extremely dangerous!
Just read it.... if you get past the first three paragraphs you will find that this paper discusses the methodology on the determination of the ClO2 diffusion coefficient. That is, how fast it passes through organic membranes to figure out how much and how long an application would be needed in a antiseptic application on a surface, like human skin or a wound. It suggests that an aqueous solution has a large therapeutic window as a surface disinfectant in local antiseptic applications.
There is nothing in there to suggest ingesting a solution of an organic compound, like ClO2 is safe or therapeutic. There is zero therapeutic evidence that I can find for ingesting it.
Nobody? Go google MMS on Youtube.
Or search for your favorite all-knowing-youtuber mailab
or look at any other mainstream media
;)
Fine, *nobody in this conversation but you.
Who is mailab? Never heard of that person.
Anyway, I know you're set on your opinion and feel superior to anyone here. So go ahead, drink your ClO2. I'm not going to stop you, I just refuse to let misinformation like that uncommented under my post.
yes. I drink my clO2 which passed enough studies and tests and you inject some weird nanotechnologic rna vaccine which doesnt even pass the normal tests, cuz WE HAVE NO TIME
go ahead
*for your information: out of clO2 comes only water, salt
but yeah, you also seem to feel superior even though you didnt read a single study cuz you couldnt find one LEL
Those studies that you refer to are likely actually indicators for testing the toxicity levels and safety levels on ClO2 as an industrial cleaner. i.e. at what levels does it cause eye irritations, throat and lung irritation and skin irritation.
People, please do not drink ClO2 it is extremely dangerous!
@jasonbu please start informing yourself before telling people what to do!
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0079157
That study is literally talking about ClO2 as an antiseptic not for ingestion!
Putting something on the skin for a while is something completely different from swallowing it and having it in your body for hours.
Just read it.... if you get past the first three paragraphs you will find that this paper discusses the methodology on the determination of the ClO2 diffusion coefficient. That is, how fast it passes through organic membranes to figure out how much and how long an application would be needed in a antiseptic application on a surface, like human skin or a wound. It suggests that an aqueous solution has a large therapeutic window as a surface disinfectant in local antiseptic applications.
There is nothing in there to suggest ingesting a solution of an organic compound, like ClO2 is safe or therapeutic. There is zero therapeutic evidence that I can find for ingesting it.