You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why does steem use this canonical thing instead of strict secp256k1?

in #beyondbitcoin8 years ago (edited)

Trouble with stuff like this is that it's really hard to pin down what may be the cause. It does not seem like they are using the canonical secp256k1. @baabeetaa and I are happy to speak with anyone about exactly how we ended up finding it. @baabeetaa suggests creating RPC libraries.

Sort:  

Well i will be actively trying to help you all get to the bottom of this. I really do remember bytemaster (aka dan larimer) saying graphene using deterministic signature scheme...but that was awhile ago and was before Steem existed. So i might be completely wrong.

Im just thankful that it wasnt something worse than this. I was a bit concerned what this could mean...

Thank you fuzzy. My total assessment is that I don't know. Thing is I or anyone should be able to know. Hell, you should be able to know, even as you say as a "code-idiot".