You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation

in #berniesanders7 years ago

I've come here only for haejin, and I've upvote only his post in the beginning, then some others after exploring a bit steemit.
But I'm not in your table ? Why ? I want to be famous too !!! (joking)

About haejin, his posts are really usefull to people who want to learn to trade and do TA. His posts does not need to be 20000 characters to describe a chart and patterns, we, haejin's follower (or at least I, but it's obvious others too), are always waiting for some update during the day about a coin, and are very interested in the coins haejin spotted some bullish behaviour.
His blogs is really game changing if you want to learn to make TA, like he says, following his blog and videos can really truncate the learning curve, of course you need to read some book and try on your own on the chart but his vision on the chart and pattern can make you see things you'll never notice before months or years of practice.
Please stop this stupid war of votes, more than 5 000 people came to steemit, some bought some coins/power and explore the platform. Haejin has maybe a huge part of the pool, but he has made steemit grow more than anyone esle could do in 2 or 3 weeks, so I think he deserves the rewards.
Now if there is really a problem with that, steemit has to change, maybe by setting limits to the reward/post and what the max percentage of the pool a single account can receive, there is some decreasing value for voting for a new post, so why not implement a similar system for rewards ? Everyone will be happy and haejin will continue to posts and bring people to the platform wich is GOOD because people buy steem.