if the beauty means simply the physical beauty of a thing or person, it is of very temporary nature. a beauty with aesthetic value is of permanent nature. but whatever kind of beauty it may be, it is very unreasonable to conclude that it will be the source of joy forever. nothing in this world is so beautiful which can always give us happiness and joy.
the pretty face of a most beautiful woman of the world, the innocence smile of a child, any kind of beautiful scene of nature, the sculpture of leonardo da vinci, the painting of raphael, the music of beethoven the plays of shakespeare the verses os kalidas the epics of homer and milton, the poetry of keats or tagore or anything else is so beautiful as to give joy forever. even the loveliest of objects lose some of their charm with the period of time. variety is necessary even in preserving the charm and appeal of beautiful objects. as such it is not true to say that a thing of beauty is a joy forever.
Good post
thank you so much.....
you received an up vote from danlupi with voting power of 100.00%
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by nitinaryan from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.