Well, at the first place I think, there is nothing called 'State of Entitlement’. I have tried to post quality content, but did not get a lot of rewards - but that does not create any negative impression for me. I see many posts that are heavily rewarded are short posts that does not seem valuable to me but it could be valuable for someone else. Even whether its valuable or not, people just upvote either manually or through auto votes. So there is something that is driving that and there is nothing to be envy of it. May be the authors have been able to impress since long time and enjoying the rewards. So something they have done, that others are not able to do.

I follow some people with whom now I am personally connected and they get good rewards for each of their post but I am not envy of that. Rather, I do what I like and I think, people need to learn to build so called entitlement by posting content, that would bring attention and I have seen some people being success. They may not be getting equal rewards, but they will get there, if they do it consistently.

I would rather more worried about how we can make hive more popular to bring more investors. We have a second layer JSON capability that is unique that can be leveraged by app developers. We need to create examples, tutorials and market that. Both are very important - clear documentation and marketing. I seriously feel, we are lacking marketing and part of the DAO funding should be utilized for that. If we can bring in more dapps with unique value propositions then there will be investors and that will ultimately benefit everyone - authors as well as curators, investors.