Costs though might make this unlikely. I think better is Citizen's income which covers all US Citizen's who reach a certain age.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Costs though might make this unlikely. I think better is Citizen's income which covers all US Citizen's who reach a certain age.
Because we actually already collect taxes for programs like SNAP, WIC, EITC, CTC, and provide tax expenditures in the form of child deductions and other tax expenditures, the basic income for kids part is actually mostly revenue neutral. We'd really just be combining everything into one flat universal amount, and increasing the size a bit.