That practice of grading according to style baffles me...such a shallow way to think about art!
You raise an interesting point about using sacred geometry - something I often use as well - and I agree that in working with existing forms and subjects we are making something powerful and impactful but not really expressive or inventive per se. I suppose it's a question of whether we take it further. There are times that I've seen for instance seed of life digital works that ARE art (at least I see them that way). Someone has taken the geometry and added to it in a way that inspires feeling and takes it to a new level. This thread reminds me even more than usual how my value of something really has nothing to do with whether it is art of craft and rather it's substance, aesthetic, and heart, does it move me, do I love it etc... Yes I can think about it and why it's brilliant but I'll only reach into my pocket to buy it if it truly moves me and I love it.
Love these conversations ;-)
On a personal level, I don't really "care" very much whether something is art of craft. What I care about is whether or not I felt something in its presence... and that feeling can be a range of things from simply a deep appreciation for someone's extraordinary mastery of their medium, to something being deeply evocative... to a whole range of other feelings.
Ultimate question: Did the work cause someone to STOP and feel like they ENGAGED with what they saw? If the answer is "yes," then the piece "worked;" it did its thing.
Agreed, well said