I like that you try to describe your work, although i feel you could have done it better, more extensively. I also like that you describe the model, although in this particular case, you only just copied from that site @cheetah has indicated.
It is better you describe using your own words. You may only just read from other sources, but capture the ideas in your own words.
Otherwise, i admire that your attempts to describe the drawing, which is, by the way, very exceptional and well drawn.
I think that to increase levels of engagement, posts image/photo/drawing posts should always be augmented with some brief description, just as you here attempt.
Thanks @mirror. I will try to add more description in my next work and i will do my best to describe my model rather than copy it from the site.
Thank you for your contribution. I really appreciate.
The pleasure is mine, @maxijgcomm. Meanwhile, do you know of the @asapers? They are a group that manually scouts and curates high quality content, especially of those who follow them.
I am one of the curators for @asapers. I wish that we may continue our conversations, and learn from each other, support each other.
So if you don't mind, and can manage the time, follow the @asapers and join the pol out of which are daily chosen not less than 3 authors to be curated by the @asapers.
You may also consider joining the @asapers disocord, https://discord.gg/3KHnJ7. There i am on 24.7 and we can share so much. You will also get to meet several other wonderful self-supporting members.
Cheers!
Alright, I will check out on it. I wont mind joinig if it is worth my time.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Regards..
You are welcome @maxijgcomm.