Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
It does not matter that one post was published a few seconds after the other or exactly at the same second on a different account.
The second post, whichever one it was contains copied content from the other. Both posts have this content as the highlight of the post. The rewards were not declined on the second post.
I thought that what recycling of content means was understandable to you since you have reported the same activity dozens of times throughout the years.
Following this excuse, someone else could also create multiple accounts and then post the same content on all of them at the same time to fish for multiple rewards.
As I understood the argument, previously published content was the context. Both posts did not contain recycled content within Hive.
Both posts had the same timestamp, neither were ahead or before, these were at the same time published, as previously mentioned on the link to their respective timestamps.
Does it matter whether the post has been set to burn vs declined? both scenarios doesn't give the author rewards. Regarding the burn posts seen in this account and the content within the post and comments are repeated. How does this get a pass?
I see now that the post had rewards set to burn.
I did not notice it before. Thanks for explaining.
I will edit the comment.