Genocide in Myanmar & Stop Genocide of Rohingya

in #arakanes7 years ago

Stop Genocide of Rohingya
International agencies and news channels have been on the agenda for days in Myanmar. But neither the United Nations (UN) is running for the help of the Rohingyalar, who lives in the Arakanese region, which faces the threat of being sent to the Organization of Southeast Asian Countries Cooperation (ASEAN) or the Organization for Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Thousands of Muslims took refuge in Bangladesh. Bangladesh closed its doors. The Arakan Muslims, trapped in a closed frontier and behind them, are determined to destroy themselves, one by one, before the eyes of the whole world.

It is emphasized that the UN has prepared ethnic cleansing against the Rohingyalia in the rapord that it has prepared about the events that took place. According to the report, Muslims massacre in Myanmar; mass rape events are happening; life areas are being destroyed. According to Myanmar's Nobel Peace Prize-winning political leader Aung San Suu Kyi, there is no such thing as ethnic cleansing in the middle; terrorist activities and legitimate government forces fighting against them.

Indeed, there is no ethnic cleansing in Myanmar. Because living is a manifest genocide. In the early 1990s, the UN, unable to describe the genocide committed by Serbs against Bosnian Muslims as genocide, invented the concept of ethnic cleansing. Despite the fact that all of the crimes against humanity described in the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the UN Genocide Criminal Act of 1948 were fully committed, Serbian armed forces were not considered to have committed genocide at that time.



A similar experience in Bosnia today is happening in Myanmar. And again, the UN is engaged in beating the air with the concept of ethnic cleansing. However, the second article of the above mentioned contract describes how to look at the genocide:

'Any of the following acts committed in order to remove, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group constitutes a crime of genocide. a) the killing of members of the Grubu; b) serious physical or mental harm to members of the Group; c) deliberately altering the living conditions by calculating, in whole or in part, the physical presence of the group; d) to take measures in order to prevent births within the group; e) Forcing children belonging to the Grub to another group. '

Anyone who reads this definition will find that the crime committed against the Rohingya by the Myanmar army and Buddhist gangs is a genocide. Genocide is the lowest crime against humanity. Where the fugitives escape the world, they must be brought to justice and punished. Those who have dealt with the acts described as genocide can in no way take shelter behind the principle of 'not interfering with the country's internal affairs', which is held in the seventh paragraph of the second article of the UN Treaty. Because crimes against humanity are outside the scope of this principle. Moreover, in the final declaration of the World Summit held in 2005 by the UN, states have a responsibility to protect their own people from genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity. According to the same text, it is also regulated that the UN Security Council, if necessary, will intervene with the regional organizations if an early warning system will be established by the UN, which can not protect its people against these crimes, and if the state fails to protect its people against these crimes . The concept of responsibility for protection has been cited in several years by various UN Security Council resolutions.


However, as hundreds of thousands of Arakanese Muslims are being dragged into the face of extinction, it is clear that there is no intention to recall the UN Security Council's concept of protectionism, which prioritizes strategic accounts in Asia.

Only one state hears the cry from Arakan. For the very first time, the alienated United Nations has the Rohingyalara of Turkey, not because of the responsibility of protection that it has never been able to apply in real terms, but because of the misery imposed on history by itself. President Erdoğan is trying to stop the persecution by calling the UN Secretary General, the leaders of the world and Islamic countries. Foreign Minister Çavuşoğlu declares that all the costs of Rohingyalar will be covered by Turkey, while he wants to open its doors from Bangladesh. The charity organizations that are in the background of our nationality compete with each other to help our brothers in Arakan.

It was like this yesterday. It will be like that from now on. Where there is an oppression these folks will run for his help. Even if the whole world is alone with the tyrants, each individual of this nation will stand beside the spiritual and material oppression.

Sort:  

Wow, this is extremely sad. I'm somewhat speechless learning about this. Best wishes :)

Congratulations @koroglu14! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You got a First Reply
Award for the number of upvotes received
Award for the number of comments

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

You are mentioning Islamic countries. According to what are you giving this label and which countries are those countries?

Do you really believe, that calling the UN Secretary General is trying to help or even stop this cruelty?

no i do not think you're trying to stop it. They do not care if the poor people die. If there was wealth in this country, maybe something changed.

Not even than. Syria was a rich country compared to Myanmar and so was Iraq, but instead of stopping the war, they triggered it and put fuel into the fire.

If you say that the countries have intervened because there is oil richness, why is not intervention in mynmar?

It wasn't me, who said that they intervened because of the wealth; you said:

If there was wealth in this country, maybe something changed.

So I wanted to make the point, that not even in countries, where there is oil or other wealth they want to stop the war. Stopping wars is just not their agenda, because they earn many times from wars. They earn a lot of money by selling weapons, they can control the number of populations, they can stabilaze and destabilize countries and regions etc.

yes, I wanted to make the same comment, but I could not express what I wanted to say

No problem;)
At least now we got each other :)