Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?

Source Google

I recently read an article on the website "www.animal-testing procons.org" that provide some experts quotes related to should animal be used for scientific or commercial testing topic. Some of them pro with the statements, but, some are not. As has been stated by Dario L. Ringach in his article with entitle "the use of non human animals in biomedical research" that was published in American Journal of the Medical Sciences says that "the moral values of the animal is not same to the humans, hopefully the animal activist will come to accept the works by an honest at advancing knowledge and alleviating suffering and disease in the world."

In addition, Professor of Neurology and Neurosciences at the University of Iowa explain in very short word that the uses of animal for scientific reason is based on the condition that the resources of object are not freely available, they only object they have is animals.

Source google

Nevertheless, Director of Academic Affairs for Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine provide an argument he said that using animal in laboratory activity is contrary to the intention for providing an excellent medical education.

Seeing the current situation in the world, where the habitats on animals life is extremely destroy by the human activities, such as illegal logging, forest fire, and opening the new farmer areas have totally make the world become dangerous than in decades ago. Animals not only the big one but also the small one are not living as they want. Human activities has given them (animal) the limited space to survive.

source google

Also, the advances of technology has given a new way for finding the solution for the problem in human life, in this case I say finding a new methods related to scientific research. The modern world has been able to adapt the use of animal to animation. What the scientist need only an educational system technology expert so that they can provide an education tools or program related to their issues.

While enjoying how amateurish the life are, I always questioning my self in every single days, can the researchers and non-researchers make a clear position why they take the position they do. Without blaming each others and allocate the space to human and non-human life.

source google