FYI,,,, NO GOVERNMENT WOULD BE CORRUPTION ON A WHOLE NEW LEVEL.. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS LOOK TO ANY 3RD WORLD COUNTRY TO SEE HOW BAD IT CAN BE.. LOOK AT MEXICO,,, DRUGS, RAPE, MURDER ARE RAMPANT ,,, AND YOU CAN SEE HOW DRUG CARTELS WOULD QUICKLY RUN OVER PEOPLE VERY QUICKLY ONCE THEY START ARMING THEMSELVES.... WE NEED PEOPLE TO WATCH OVER THE COMMUNITIES.... PEOPLE NEED TO BE PAID TO DO THIS AND THEY WONT DO IT ON THEIR OWN... ... IT WOULD BE A WORLD OF VIGILANTE JUSTICE... WE NEED POLICING,,, AND WE DO NEED GOVERNING TO KEEP THE EASILY CORRUPT PEOPLE AT BAY... OTHERWISE NO ONE WOULD WORK,,, THEY WOULD STEAL AND MAKE QUICK MONEY LIKE THEY DO IN AFRICA, MEXICO, PHILIPPINES, RIO,,, NONE OF WHICH HAVE ANY SOCIAL PROGRAMS OF ANY SORT..... MEANING NO SOCIAL ASSISTANCE,,, FOOD STAMPS,,, OR EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE,,, OR EVEN A PENSION FOR THAT MATTER.... ILL KEEP MY GOVERNMENT,,,, YOU KEEP YOUR CAOS
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree. I think government should be as small as possible. However, you make some very good points why one is needed.
On a side note, why use all caps? It looks like you're yelling ;)
orion your very uneducated in this.
how do you think governments started?
they started by people coming to gather as one then they chose to dump the responsibility on a few people.
if you think anarchy is a world wide thing then you do not have any idea wtf you are talking about.
here are my points
1 if you know about drug cartels then you know they bribe the Mexican government as well as a lot of others.
2 you mention you think WE NEED PEOPLE TO WATCH OVER THE COMMUNITIES i agree,but anarchy is the absence of rulers, not rules its a whole community protecting its self and not for money but because its right.
3 what you describe is what is already happening with all governments even the usa. anyone can discover that by doing some research.
4 tell me what makes you feel safer you neighbor having your back if you are attacked in your sleep, or cops coming after your dead. by your logic you would like to have complete strangers come to your aid(slower then the people around you too) then people you know in your community. this would build trust and reliance between people in communities you will become your own protectors all one needs is the proper education
First off,,, ACES beat KINGS and JACKS.... Second,,, I can barely understand what you are writing in paragraph 4,, and you call me uneducated,,,lol... FYI,, YOUR neighbors Will not help you if you are getting robbed... YOU CAN RELY on them to TAKE OUT A CAMERA and FILM YOU DIE,,, but that is about it.... They will not get involved WHATSOEVER....
You are obviously in your TEENS,,, or in your early 20s at best. I can tell by your LACK OF LIFE EXPERIENCE.... You only have to watch an episode of COPS to see how many people will come forward when someone gets shot... Who do you think will solve THAT CRIME??? The people who don't want to get involved because they are AFRAID of RETALIATION?? Or the COPS whos job it is to CATCH YOUR MURDERER..... NOW!!! Would you like any more LESSONS, from this UNEDUCATED person????
Ok so who sets those rulse? What one person agrees is a "rule" the other may not... what then?
It has always been the ELDERS who set the RULES of any COMMUNITY... Usually the WISE,, the MATURE and the PERSONS who have shown themselves to be the MOST HONEST are usually the people you would ask to,,, set the RULES as you would put it....... That way you would have a chance of having a more transparent GOVERNMENT...
I agree but in anarchism where everyone is their own master, what happens if they disagree with the people being chosen or disagree with the rules they are implementing?