Once authority to initiate violence is granted, all is lost, no civilized society can exist. But this is done all over the world. When people stop exempting authorities from morality their lives will be changed dramatically. If it's wrong for me to rob you for charity, it's wrong for an authority to rob you to support the state. Where does an authority get his "authority"? If you don't have it and your neighbors don't either, how can authority be created? How can an elite be exempt from morality? Creating such an exemption is unjustified in reason and is a form of self-enslavement. It is an irrational belief based on fear. As such it creates more fear and is self-enforcing until the society self-destructs. This is exactly what is happening as the police brutality increases, groups polarize and attack each other, and the military expands the violence worldwide.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm not even disagreeing that when people in a position of power abuse it, it causes dismay with the people. I'm calling you out because this isn't saying fuck "bad cops" and that the cops enlisted sound have to go through measures to ensure they're mentally stable for the job, it's just an edgy middle schooler "FUCK DA POLICE" with a coat of fancy paint
That is a crock of shit. If even a fraction of the provably real convictions of corrupt, evil, criminal cops, are real, then there is no 'test' of mental suitability for the job of being a road pirate that has any meaning whatsoever.
Your contention is like the kid standing behind the principal in middle school, saying 'Yeah!' to the mean kids when he's telling them to be nice to you.
It'll do you just as much good, too, when the principal isn't there to protect you from the bad kids, and they turn out to be the ones that wanted jobs being mean to people and the only ones with firepower, so they can get away with anything they want.
When they want to get away with something of yours, your attitude today will ensure you have no allies to help you.
Think about that.
Dude, you can go on long rants about how I'm defending people who have done nothing wrong all you want, but my argument still stands: because not ALL cops are corrupt and power hungry, it's ignorant, lazy, and childish to attack a people for its extremists. What's funny is I can tell if I apply your logic to Muslims (despite that their holy book calls for the murder of non Muslims) you'd call me a bigot or that if I bring up that the media you hate so much is primarily run and controlled by jews, you'd call me antisemitic.
Not as long as you, apparently. No one is paying me to shill.
You can't make even one true statement. Every sentence you wrote there contains demonstrable untruths.
I shall cease feeding you, troll.
Not all cops are corrupt, you fucking autist. This isn't an opinion, this is a fact based on unbiased logical reasoning. You're just upset that the fact that you can't LOGICALLY put every cop in the "corrupt" category completely destroys your "BRO ANARCHY FIGHT DA POWER" narrative. Some cops are assholes. Some grocers are assholes. Some teachers are assholes. Some people are assholes. Instead of being a coward and hiding behind a blanket statement, why not attack the ideology of the corruption itself? Because that takes work? Because then you'd have to evaluate people individually? Because then you're not the "so cool freedom fighter" you think you are fighting what you perceive to be the biggest issue in the country? Grow a pair and look at the REAL issues. Race superiority (black, white, brown or otherwise) is an issue. A polarizing society is the issue. Jackasses who believe in nothing but what the mainstream media put out for them (which most of the time isn't the full story or is just a flat out lie meant to misdirect the masses from issues that would otherwise damage their narrative) is the issue. So the next time you think about saying "HUR DUR FUCK DIS GROUP", think for a second: is it the WHOLE group, or is it a handfull that the media prop up because it's more newsworthy to talk about an asshole than a saint? And remember when you polarize, you're doing nothing more than contributing to the "divide and conquer" doctrine that's actually one of the biggest and most deadly issues in modern America.
People are social creatures, and part of our behaviour is to join a group and defend it, even to the death. For patriotism.
This isn't news. It's been abused for millenia, and the folks sucking down blue pills like they're addicts actually are addicts. They're addicted to being slaves.
Those of us that aren't are in the minority. Morality has nothing to do with biology, and expecting people born to be slaves to 'wake up' and become human beings instead of cattle is unrealistic. It is more useful to consider ways in which the woke, but non-psychopathic, those who aren't interested in mastering hordes of slaves, might engender our freedom from the psychopaths.
Maybe when we do that, we'll be able to create a less predatory world for the born slaves. I'm not sure it's really our job, except that we need to keep that resource, the billions of slaves that want to be slaves, out of the hands of psychopaths.
That's a damn tall order, and I sure haven't got a master plan to get it done.
I'd like to see one though, with reasonable chances of success.
Voting isn't the way, and war sucks. What is the third way? I was kinda hoping it might form around crypto.
Still am.