That really sucks. :(
When we had more freedom we had more free market capitalism and our GDP was growing a lot faster along with our wealth.
Robots.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That really sucks. :(
When we had more freedom we had more free market capitalism and our GDP was growing a lot faster along with our wealth.
Robots.
Im down with robots, but what about the people that get pushed out?
The tin shed is in my buddy's backyard, he got replaced by a computer.
He worked in tv. You saw what clearchannel did to radio dj's.
More taxes on those that do work?
Or free stuff?
When things are free the bums have less excuses for not contributing.
They can go to the community center and do something that needs done.
Now there is no money to pay them.
With free market capitalism there would be more jobs and prices would be lower.
Is your buddy on the steem blockchain?
We need less taxes and less government so prices will be lower and the inflation tax will be lower.
Nope, not on steem.
He is a card carrying democrat from chicago.
He loves hitlary and is waiting for her to save him!
We need to keep working and stop paying, so we can short circuit this bankster dystopia.
Half measures and reforms wont help, they will just shift tactics.
Its their game, dont expect to beat them at it.
That is a fool's game.
He could DJ on Dlive. I might actually watch and give him some upvotes.
I think Trump is doing Ok but it would be nice if he cut the military spending instead of increasing it.
I think we need to stop going into debt. Banks make money off loans.
We need major reforms some of which can't happen overnight. I don't think we should eliminate all of our social welfare programs instantly but we should begin to phase them out after we cut things like military spending and some unnecessary government programs.
Why wouldnt we increase our support of the people harmed the most by crapitalism's need of a military?
Every dollar spent on it is a dollar that a worker didnt get in wages.
You need to get out and meet some of those people on welfare, they are not all able to keep a job even if jobs were given freely.
Not everybody is going to be a square peg to go into your square holes.
Its easy to declare off with the stranger's head, but every one of those people are sons and daughters of somebody.
Is it their fault that they didnt gave fortunate upbringings?
That is why my proposal will shame the shammers into productivity while protecting the actually infirm.
Because socialism is bad. lol We need to decrease government but I would start with foreign aid and the military and then things like drug enforcement and the education department etc etc. before we start killing welfare.
Big government raises prices which hurts the poor and government regulations make it harder to hire people.
Socialism has consequences. We need to scale it back before it is too late.
Under anarchy I think there would be much less help for the poor.
You wouldnt think that if you did the research because you would know that being poor isnt possible in anarchy.
You can be a bum, but that is your right as a free person.
And i agree, robbing the less poor to pay for the more poor doesnt solve the problems that generational wealth creates.
I say we nullify their advantages in the math, and shame them all into being productive.