He could DJ on Dlive. I might actually watch and give him some upvotes.
I think Trump is doing Ok but it would be nice if he cut the military spending instead of increasing it.
I think we need to stop going into debt. Banks make money off loans.
We need major reforms some of which can't happen overnight. I don't think we should eliminate all of our social welfare programs instantly but we should begin to phase them out after we cut things like military spending and some unnecessary government programs.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Why wouldnt we increase our support of the people harmed the most by crapitalism's need of a military?
Every dollar spent on it is a dollar that a worker didnt get in wages.
You need to get out and meet some of those people on welfare, they are not all able to keep a job even if jobs were given freely.
Not everybody is going to be a square peg to go into your square holes.
Its easy to declare off with the stranger's head, but every one of those people are sons and daughters of somebody.
Is it their fault that they didnt gave fortunate upbringings?
That is why my proposal will shame the shammers into productivity while protecting the actually infirm.
Because socialism is bad. lol We need to decrease government but I would start with foreign aid and the military and then things like drug enforcement and the education department etc etc. before we start killing welfare.
Big government raises prices which hurts the poor and government regulations make it harder to hire people.
Socialism has consequences. We need to scale it back before it is too late.
Under anarchy I think there would be much less help for the poor.
You wouldnt think that if you did the research because you would know that being poor isnt possible in anarchy.
You can be a bum, but that is your right as a free person.
And i agree, robbing the less poor to pay for the more poor doesnt solve the problems that generational wealth creates.
I say we nullify their advantages in the math, and shame them all into being productive.
Under anarchy it would be legal for you to get robbed and murdered so you would be poor before you got murdered.
I think generational wealth is fine. We need more wealth creation in general though and less wealth destruction.
Sounds good in theory but if they are lazy wouldn't if be easier for them to just rob you?
See there? You just did it again. Smdh.
Nothing is legal if there are no laws.
Of course you do.
Muslims think allah is great.
Same mental programming at work.
It isnt possible for you to think anything else.
You've never been offered a viable alternative.
All alternatives have been debunked by 'authority', and you worship that, too.
I bet you call cops, sir, dont ya?
Ok, stick with me here, 'Never pay for ANYTHING ever again.' And, 'An attack on one is an attack on all.'
So, no, not easier to rob me.
If my neighbors hold me in high regards it could get you strung up as an example.
Everything is "legal" allowable if there are no laws.
If you work hard and save up and die you think anarchits should steal your wealth away from your family?
You don't want to have anything? People don't just steal money.
You assume people would still band together and work together. I agree and that generally takes leaders to accomplish. Leaders typically do not do things for free so you would still have a quasi government.
I think you have a more positive view of humans. I think humans were generally so awesome and cared about you they would already be banding together to reduce government. It's easier to vote for smaller government than to act as a policeman.