For the government to stop the 1%, they need to force the rest of us to pay taxes?
That makes a lot of sense... Yeah...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
For the government to stop the 1%, they need to force the rest of us to pay taxes?
That makes a lot of sense... Yeah...
You are confused by the massive amount of excess government, into thinking that ZERO government is the answer.
Let's try a simpler experiment first. Federal government stops doing 80% of things it is currently doing, that are over reaches of its initial mandate.
And taxes will go way down, and government will be left performing only the mandatory basic functions.
I'll take government running the National Guard over your system of lots of little mobs fighting for territory.
If you want to go live in Mad Max country, lots of squabbling between well armed gangs fighting wit bullets to protect their territory, you should just move to Chicago and leave the rest of us alone.
Your utopia with no effective central government officials that want to enforce the peace, lots of weapons on the streets, whoever has the most bullets is in power ALREADY EXISTS. It is called Chicago. Go live there.
Enjoy your utopia !!!
Created courtesy of Obama, Rahm, and several decades of Democratic corruption.
The government running a nanny service isn't going to convince anyone that they are worth paying taxes. If the government didn't abuse their power and go around fucking people over all the time, then no one would be afraid to skip paying their taxes, and the government would collapse. I am only taking the logic to it's necessary conclusion. It is not about the amount of government, it is about whether or not the exchange is done voluntarily. Government is inherently coercive, and therefore unethical and impractical. I am not confused in the slightest.
Also I didn't realize Chicago was anarchist... The police are the biggest gang, in case you didn't know.