But what right do you have to take away the possibility of other to do that?
Not to mention that this, again, has nothing to do with property. You can do this without owning the land. And I don't want to point to American Natives here again, who did not understand how the white man could say he own the land, which was obvious BS.
Then I can come and tear up your house, correct? Because you have no right to force me off of the land it is on. This is real life. Physical space has limitations. Resources are scarce, and people have needs. The best system is one that recognizes this obvious reality.
Native Americans had property as well, which is why opposing tribes had battles.
Now you are back at the house instead of the interesting point of the land.
It is obviously connected. If you do not own the land then you cannot force me off of it. Whether your house is there or not.