I never stated it was my views, i just pulled a couple ideas presented by both sides of the argument. That is clearly stated in the post, and it also states where those thoughts came from in the source section.
I think you misunderstood thinking these are my personal views.
look im not the best at saying what i mean but the fact that you pulled it of others post is one of the problems you must form your own opinion to help enrich the ideology and help other in some way, not create some Frankenstein for other peoples post it is to unpredictable it can lead to a great post or a very negative post .
if i were one of the anarchist with a more limited mind set you would be getting harassed dude .
and yes i agree most anarchist are not to good at explaining there points or beliefs.
thats mainly because we are to use to being shut down or at least the ones i know of.
It wasn't posted off of another's "post", it was from a website, which was linked at the bottom.
I posted both positives and negatives that many people have expressed. It is meant to stir a debate about which really is the better system, unfortunately there is no way of knowing because there will most likely never be a true anarchist worldwide environment so it is impossible to predict the unforeseen outcomes.
To be honest I'm not even sure what your point is besides bashing the initial post over and over again even though I have clearly responded to your supposed offenses...
*ok so in other words you just did this to get votes.
*you have no opinions or views.(you haven't answered my questions about your personal opinion which leads me to believe you have none,and that tell me your know nothing.)
*and this which is very clearly bullshit
I think you misunderstood thinking these are my personal views.(to me this means your an idot)
First of all your posts have been presented in an attacking fashion and I am this close to reporting you. You can have a civil debate without name calling, getting personal, etc.
Secondly, I stated early in a comment that I think the best course is to have a government but to have as small of a government as possible. Yes there are negatives to having a government but between the 2 evils I chose that one.
I never stated it was my views, i just pulled a couple ideas presented by both sides of the argument. That is clearly stated in the post, and it also states where those thoughts came from in the source section.
I think you misunderstood thinking these are my personal views.
look im not the best at saying what i mean but the fact that you pulled it of others post is one of the problems you must form your own opinion to help enrich the ideology and help other in some way, not create some Frankenstein for other peoples post it is to unpredictable it can lead to a great post or a very negative post .
if i were one of the anarchist with a more limited mind set you would be getting harassed dude .
luckily they haven't really found this site yet
and plus the side that is normal against anarchy isn't really to good at even trying to understand it,or how it can be possible.
and yes i agree most anarchist are not to good at explaining there points or beliefs.
thats mainly because we are to use to being shut down or at least the ones i know of.
Harrassed for what? Ha!
It wasn't posted off of another's "post", it was from a website, which was linked at the bottom.
I posted both positives and negatives that many people have expressed. It is meant to stir a debate about which really is the better system, unfortunately there is no way of knowing because there will most likely never be a true anarchist worldwide environment so it is impossible to predict the unforeseen outcomes.
To be honest I'm not even sure what your point is besides bashing the initial post over and over again even though I have clearly responded to your supposed offenses...
the positives and negative very on how you do it why is it so hard for you to get that?
see you haven't responded to my question about your views.
"i just pulled a couple ideas presented by both sides of the argument. "
get off your high horse you moron
if you got it from the internet its a dame post
*ok so in other words you just did this to get votes.
*you have no opinions or views.(you haven't answered my questions about your personal opinion which leads me to believe you have none,and that tell me your know nothing.)
*and this which is very clearly bullshit
I think you misunderstood thinking these are my personal views.(to me this means your an idot)
also what are your views? kinda wish i asked before the other posts
First of all your posts have been presented in an attacking fashion and I am this close to reporting you. You can have a civil debate without name calling, getting personal, etc.
Secondly, I stated early in a comment that I think the best course is to have a government but to have as small of a government as possible. Yes there are negatives to having a government but between the 2 evils I chose that one.
haaaaaaa your so said you would rather report person then try to make sense out of them how mental lazy.
No I'd rather have a debate about the topic without name calling and personal attacks.