Individuals whose preferences led them to reject property or land ownership could practice their values within that system. But individuals whose preferences led them to embrace property or land ownership (especially for profit) could not practice their values within, for instance, a mutualist system.
Exactly. Voluntaryism is open to other philosophies as long as all human interaction is voluntary. It is live and let live. The same cannot be said for large swathes (almost the entire, I dare say) anarcho-communist community.
I’ve actually received nerdy veiled death threats from more than one of these folks for suggesting I should be able to run a cookie shop from my house if I please.
Very silly.
The crux of this piece was basically around that concept, that ANARCHY doesn't require anyone to conform to any given economic model, and that those who are attempting to say it can't be real anarchy without their specific adjective are sort of missing the point.