The necessity of providing myself shelter. You don't agree that if I begin building a small home on a patch of land, and you come later, I have claim to the home?
I don't have legitimate claim to the exclusive use of that home? Why not?
And if I do have claim to the home (as you have agreed--we cannot forcefully enter each others' homes uninvited) then how will you get to the land upon which it sits? To get to it you would have to breach my home (due to the nature of physical objects in space) and yes, then I would force you out.
You seem to be unable to make a distinction between land and something you put on it.
I can make that distinction fine. I am simply saying that for all practical purposes, due to the nature of physical space (being under my house) you cannot get to it. If my house is mine, on top of the land, then the land is inaccessible to you. If I own my house, and you have no right to enter without an invitation, then you also cannot get to the land, without breaching my house, at which point I would use force to remove you, effectively forcing off of the land underneath it as well. This is very simple man. It's been nice talking with you.
Okay, then explain why you think you have the right to build a house on land that you not own, because nobody owns it, just because nobody was able to stop you in time.
(Which is basically what happened with the homesteading act in the "Wild West")
If nobody can build a house, we are all in trouble bro.
Nobody said you can't build one, bro!
I was just asking who gave you the right to do it.
Nature. The "right" to try anduse my body to survive, at least, and that includes taking/building shelter.
But what right do you have to take away the possibility of other to do that?
Not to mention that this, again, has nothing to do with property. You can do this without owning the land. And I don't want to point to American Natives here again, who did not understand how the white man could say he own the land, which was obvious BS.