Steemit will succeed but it's not because he offers an anarchic model. He will succeed because people receive a reward and reputation. Anarchist is attractive for a small community but a repellent for a majority.
It Steemit, we can just leave if we do not like it. This is freedom. This is anarchistic. We can choose not to be part of it.
I can quit any organization, I am free and I am not an anarchist.
No you're not. You are coerced into government statist authoritarian control of your life, and you can't just "leave". Why is this so hard to understand? Read the post properly. Understand what anarchy is. Thanks.
We live on planet Earth and I think it is real. Men live in "Survival" mode. There will always be, I think, groups who want to govern people they are: humanist, dictator, republican, democrat, religion, environmentalist, anarchist, criminal, mafia, etc .. and others who will suffer or who accept this governance. But it is possible to improve the relationship between governors and governed
I think you may have misunderstood the point of anarchism. How do you add that an individual who wants anarchy, seeks to govern others? How can this not be an obvious oxymoron? If an anarchist wants to govern others, he then no longer is an anarchist but something else. So "anarchists" can not be the proper word for what you meant, unless of course you have misunderstood it.