Sort:  

It might be important to note here that there are Anarcho-Capitalists that prefer social constructs exist(left), and others that do not(right).

As long as im not ruled by force i dont care what we call it.
In a real money paradigm there is about a nickels worth of difference.

Crapitalism, of any type, allows some to eat at the expense of others, i dont see that existing without the ability to force people to comply.
Freedom wont include wage slavery, 'voluntary', or otherwise, but you will be free to try.
Just count me out.

The way I see it, it does matter. Even the ancaps that prefer to have some type of 'common law' or 'social enforcement' of property rights will build a social construct that will eventually beg for authority to pursue its ends.

If you and I prefer to not be ruled by force, we should strongly suggest these things not be created and deny any authority within them.

(this is one of several reasons i am not a ancap, but do see some flavors as legit and others not)

http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/the-anarchist-faq-editorial-collective-an-anarchist-faq-07-17
Ancrap is an oxymoron.

Keep working, stop paying.
Anybody that intentionally destroys the work of another has committed violence against all workers.
At least once under the new paradigm.
Destroying crapitalust property now is liberating it from someone that got it through fraud.

The first step to get there from here is to abolish IncomeTaxes. Once there is no requiement to pay taxes the unforced market will adapt. Maybe one way maybe another I don’t think It’s predictable.

Or, we could keep working, stop paying, then everything is free.

Nothing in life is ever free...

Linking to leftist anarchist dribble doesn't make anarcho capitalism disappear. As long as anarcho capitalism doesn't require social constructs, or authority, it is a form of right wing anarchy.

We went over the 'keep working, stop paying' model before. It ended with denying that workers value their time and effort, and they would toil for some metric of 'doing good in the world'.

There was no clear separation of that model from central planning, so there remains as much 'majority consensus' in your previous model as what Rothbard suggests.

Loading...

Intriguing discussion on how natural resources managed. Without “Taxation” the people will naturally squabble over exclusive rights to their claims. If I claim a gold mine and can defend it from other claims, who will tell me otherwise? @freebornangel