Technically, with human ingenuity, we are now able to feed, house, cloth, provide energy to, and provide reasonable access to travel to everyone, without a "price tag". Money no longer needs to be in the way. And with these needs met, the reduction of the side effects of social insufficiencies would reduce - violence, crime, theft, division, poor physical and mental health, etc. When people ask me why I think people should access to these things, I say BECAUSE WE CAN - not too difficult. They ask "who will do the work?" The machines that do it now. "Who will build the machines?" The people who do it now, and who also have an interest in realizing a better society than this. You know, some, actually many people love to spend their time involved in the interests they're passionate about, and would do it regardless of man made money incentives. If all my basic needs were met, I'd still love doing comic book art, I'd still want to be involved in a variety of ways in building sustainable communities. And my interests may spread and evolve, because this new found freedom would allow me to see more of the world, meet more of the people, take part in more experiences. For people who are against this - Why?
Hi, enjay! I just resteemed your post!
I can also re-steem and upvote some of your other posts
Curious? Check out @resteembot's' introduction post
PS: If your reputation is lower than 30 re-blogging with @resteembot only costs 0.001 SBD
https://postimg.org/image/hukd3tgs5/3372f0a9/