the campaigns official statement VERY clearly states that we do not stand for the breaking of the NAP.
And as I stated multiple times now; the writer of the official statement supported a post that gave an argument that doxxing and hacking doesn't violate the NAP so how I'm so supposed to believe it's sincerity?
kafka gave out bens work information so that people would get him fired. that's doxxing. kafka associated my real name against my consent on this platform. that's doxxing. you seem to not mind that.
Kafka is not asking me to vote for him and as I said before I don't like Kafka. Not to mention that since your campaign site doesn't have any privacy statement (that I can find, if you could point me to it that would be very helpful) your campaign could theoretically release any of your past supporters information.
he gave no indication that he was going to doxx anyone. aquire the services of someone that basically would act as a private investigator, maybe.
Remember when I said I would denounce the alleged behavior if this was me. This is why.
The screenshots that are shown show at the very least show the hacker was trying to find where Kafka was located. Is there a good reason why Ben would need to know where Kafka lives? Since Ben initiated contact, never questions why he would need to know where kafka lives, responds with "your the best" when the hacker says he found a licence plate, texts "God damn I fucking hate that guy" and won't even take time defend himself.
What am I supposed to believe he was going to use this info for?
you're questioning me about doxxing when there is no indication that ben was going to doxx anyone...
The hacker is giving an allegation that Ben was trying to doxx Kafka. So there's a witness. If Ben were to speak up then maybe it could be a he said/ she said type situation but that's not happening is it?
Tell me you said multiple times you don't know the full story. Why are you so set on defending someone who won't defend themselves? All I asked your campaign to do was give a better statement.
i feel you're less than sincere.
I've went out of my way to give you a way to salvage your campaign but instead you chose to argue with me and defend the screenshots when I wasn't even arguing about them.
Wow. Youre either trolling or incapable of understanding.
The campaign has nothing to do with all of this.
That's it.
Posted using Partiko Android
Sometimes, you work for a campaign in order to appropriate its capabilities, or its people. Other times, you do it to liquidate, and flush a bunch of garbage down the toilet. I don't care who your family is, who you know, how much money you have, if you aren't a true professional, or are ethically questionable, I wouldn’t want you working for me. Go clean the sewer. The fact that Adam refuses to address or denounce Ben is a testament to his TRUE character and what his TRUE intentions are. I’m going to assume he’s financially motivated because that was the reason he wanted Graham Smith gone.
In the screenshots show Ben allegedlly giving a link that calls out Adam and says "we've got a troll and he's really fucking with our money" so he was ethier doing this for the campaign without anyone's knowledge in which case you should call out the behavior to stop any would be fan from doing this again or he was told to do this by another person in the campaign.
Sweetie, if you think I'm trolling good luck dealing with the actual trolls on campaign trail.